# Amazon Nova Pro vs Qwen3.6 Flash

> Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/amazon-nova-pro-vs-qwen3-6-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Amazon Nova Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Flash in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Flash leads 42.1 to 27.4.
- Qwen3.6 Flash is cheaper at $0.19 / $1.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.80 / $3.20 for Amazon Nova Pro.
- Qwen3.6 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 300K.

## Snapshot

| | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 281 | 182 |
| Context | 300K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.80 | $0.19 |
| Output $/M | $3.20 | $1.13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Amazon Nova Pro: 35.1 (#229)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 38.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 326.4 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Amazon Nova Pro: 16.7 (#147)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 25% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 1.7% | — |

## Reasoning

- Amazon Nova Pro: 20.0 (#243)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: 29.0 (#96)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 123.8 | 143.26 |
| SimpleBench | — | 35.2% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 32.6% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1246 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| DTBench | — | 77.1% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 48.3% | — |
| LMCA | — | 31% |
| LiveBench | 43.5% | — |

## Math

- Amazon Nova Pro: 28.5 (#243)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: 39.0 (#117)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 22.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.4% |
| Omni-MATH | 24.2% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 38% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1252 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 10.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- Amazon Nova Pro: 27.4 (#250)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.1 (#100)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 83.3% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 15.9% |
| MMLU-Pro | 67.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 30.1% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.1% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 44.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1211 | — |
| MMLU | 82% | — |

## Multimodal

- Amazon Nova Pro: 25.0 (#126)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 980 | — |

## Multilingual

- Amazon Nova Pro: 39.7 (#223)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1234 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1244 | — |
| LMArena French | 1271 | — |
| LMArena German | 1243 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1200 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1203 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1240 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1182 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Amazon Nova Pro: 64.9 (#226)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 67.1% | — |
| IFEval | 81.5% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1235 | — |

## Long Context

- Amazon Nova Pro: 38.1 (#205)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1255 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Amazon Nova Pro: 43.9 (#226)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1212 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 60.5% | — |
| WildBench | 77.7% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1246 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 37% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Amazon Nova Pro better than Qwen3.6 Flash?

Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Pro or Qwen3.6 Flash?

Qwen3.6 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.19 per million input tokens and $1.13 per million output tokens; Amazon Nova Pro lists at $0.80 and $3.20.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.6 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 300K.

### How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Pro and Qwen3.6 Flash share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Amazon Nova Pro has 38 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Flash has 13.