# Amazon Nova Pro vs Llama 3.2 90B

> Amazon Nova Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.0 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/amazon-nova-pro-vs-llama-3-2-90b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Pro scores higher in 2 categories and Llama 3.2 90B in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Amazon Nova Pro leads 28.5 to 11.1.
- Llama 3.2 90B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Amazon Nova Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 27.5 |
| Rank | 281 | 331 |
| Context | 300K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.80 | — |
| Output $/M | $3.20 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Amazon Nova Pro: 35.1 (#229)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 38.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Amazon Nova Pro: 16.7 (#147)
- Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 25% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 1.7% | — |
| BALROG | — | 27.3% |

## Reasoning

- Amazon Nova Pro: 20.0 (#243)
- Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 123.8 | 125.5 |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.4% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 32.6% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1246 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 48.3% | — |
| LiveBench | 43.5% | — |

## Math

- Amazon Nova Pro: 28.5 (#243)
- Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.6% |
| Omni-MATH | 24.2% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 38% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1252 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.4% |

## Knowledge

- Amazon Nova Pro: 27.4 (#250)
- Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 82% | 80.3% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.4% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 67.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 30.1% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.1% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 44.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1211 | — |

## Multimodal

- Amazon Nova Pro: 25.0 (#126)
- Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 980 | 1000 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |

## Multilingual

- Amazon Nova Pro: 39.7 (#223)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1234 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1244 | — |
| LMArena French | 1271 | — |
| LMArena German | 1243 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1200 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1203 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1240 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1182 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Amazon Nova Pro: 64.9 (#226)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 67.1% | — |
| IFEval | 81.5% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1235 | — |

## Long Context

- Amazon Nova Pro: 38.1 (#205)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1255 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Amazon Nova Pro: 43.9 (#226)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1212 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 60.5% | — |
| WildBench | 77.7% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1246 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 37% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Amazon Nova Pro better than Llama 3.2 90B?

Amazon Nova Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.0 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Pro and Llama 3.2 90B share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Pro has 38 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.