# Amazon Nova Pro vs GPT-4o

> Amazon Nova Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.5 to 28.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/amazon-nova-pro-vs-gpt-4o
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 37

## Summary

- They share 37 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Pro scores higher in 3 categories and GPT-4o in 7 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Amazon Nova Pro leads 26.4 to 10.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Reasoning: 32.6% for Amazon Nova Pro and 55.8% for GPT-4o.
- Amazon Nova Pro is cheaper at $0.80 / $3.20 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for GPT-4o.
- Amazon Nova Pro accepts more context: 300K tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | Amazon Nova Pro | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 30.5 | 28.5 |
| Rank | 278 | 316 |
| Context | 300K | 128K |
| Input $/M | $0.80 | $2.50 |
| Output $/M | $3.20 | $10 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Amazon Nova Pro: 34.6 (#224)
- GPT-4o: 25.1 (#323)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 38.1% | 51.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1297 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 31% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 21.6% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 45.3% |
| GSO | — | 0% |
| WeirdML | — | 25.1% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 51.1% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 61.1% |
| CadEval | — | 26% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 87.2% |
| MBPP+ | — | 72.2% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Amazon Nova Pro: 16.6 (#139)
- GPT-4o: 20.8 (#133)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 1.7% | 8.6% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 25% | — |
| GDPval | — | 9.9% |
| Cybench | — | 12.5% |
| BALROG | — | 32.3% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1006 |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 40.8% |

## Reasoning

- Amazon Nova Pro: 19.2 (#240)
- GPT-4o: 9.4 (#338)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 32.6% | 55.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1246 | 1281 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 48.3% | 60.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 123.75 | 128.97 |
| LiveBench | 43.5% | 55.3% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| SimpleBench | — | 17.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 4.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 13% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.8% |
| DTBench | — | 64.5% |
| LMCA | — | 16.6% |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.7 |

## Math

- Amazon Nova Pro: 26.4 (#240)
- GPT-4o: 10.2 (#303)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 24.2% | 29.3% |
| LiveBench Math | 38% | 49.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1252 | 1285 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 0.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 53.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 0.3% |

## Knowledge

- Amazon Nova Pro: 27.1 (#246)
- GPT-4o: 28.8 (#235)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.4% | 2.7% |
| MMLU-Pro | 67.3% | 71.3% |
| Confabulations | 30.1% | 15.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.1% | 9.6% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 44.6% | 52% |
| LMArena Expert | 1211 | 1250 |
| MMLU | 82% | 88.1% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 49.2% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 26% |

## Multimodal

- Amazon Nova Pro: 24.5 (#121)
- GPT-4o: 33.9 (#85)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 980 | 1137 |
| Video-MME | — | 71.9% |
| GeoBench | — | 71% |
| VPCT | — | 40% |
| ScienceQA | — | 88.5% |

## Multilingual

- Amazon Nova Pro: 39.9 (#218)
- GPT-4o: 43.4 (#181)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1234 | 1283 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1244 | 1277 |
| LMArena French | 1270 | 1303 |
| LMArena German | 1243 | 1282 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1200 | 1257 |
| LMArena Korean | 1203 | 1234 |
| LMArena Russian | 1240 | 1286 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1182 | 1292 |

## Instruction Following

- Amazon Nova Pro: 65.1 (#221)
- GPT-4o: 66.8 (#202)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 67.1% | 68.6% |
| IFEval | 81.5% | 81.7% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1235 | 1278 |

## Long Context

- Amazon Nova Pro: 38.1 (#199)
- GPT-4o: 39.4 (#174)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1255 | 1289 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |

## Writing & Preference

- Amazon Nova Pro: 44.1 (#221)
- GPT-4o: 52.8 (#160)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1259 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1212 | 1291 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 60.5% | 81.8% |
| WildBench | 77.7% | 82.8% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1245 | 1302 |
| LiveBench Language | 37% | 47.6% |

## FAQ

### Is Amazon Nova Pro better than GPT-4o?

Amazon Nova Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.5 to 28.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Pro or GPT-4o?

Amazon Nova Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.80 per million input tokens and $3.20 per million output tokens; GPT-4o lists at $2.50 and $10.

### Is Amazon Nova Pro or GPT-4o better for coding?

Amazon Nova Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.6 versus 25.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Amazon Nova Pro does, with 300K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Pro and GPT-4o share?

37 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Pro has 38 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4o has 72.