# Amazon Nova Pro vs Command R+

> Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index. Amazon Nova Pro costs 3.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Command R+'s lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/amazon-nova-pro-vs-command-r-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 27

## Summary

- They share 27 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Pro scores higher in 6 categories and Command R+ in 2 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Amazon Nova Pro leads 20.0 to 9.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Coding: 38.1% for Amazon Nova Pro and 19.1% for Command R+.
- Amazon Nova Pro is cheaper at $0.80 / $3.20 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command R+.
- Amazon Nova Pro accepts more context: 300K tokens versus 128K.
- Command R+ has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Amazon Nova Pro | Command R+ |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Cohere |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 32.4 |
| Rank | 281 | 257 |
| Context | 300K | 128K |
| Input $/M | $0.80 | $2.50 |
| Output $/M | $3.20 | $10 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Amazon Nova Pro: 35.1 (#229)
- Command R+: 29.1 (#309)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Command R+ |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 38.1% | 19.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1187 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.8% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 41.9% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 56.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 63.5% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Amazon Nova Pro: 16.7 (#147)
- Command R+: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Command R+ |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 25% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 1.7% | — |

## Reasoning

- Amazon Nova Pro: 20.0 (#243)
- Command R+: 9.2 (#344)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Command R+ |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 32.6% | 24.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1246 | 1186 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 48.3% | 38.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 123.8 | 119.34 |
| LiveBench | 43.5% | 31.8% |
| SimpleBench | — | 17.4% |
| DTBench | — | 54.9% |
| LMCA | — | 5% |

## Math

- Amazon Nova Pro: 28.5 (#243)
- Command R+: 28.9 (#242)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Command R+ |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 38% | 21.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1252 | 1188 |
| Omni-MATH | 24.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Amazon Nova Pro: 27.4 (#250)
- Command R+: 36.4 (#169)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Command R+ |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.1% | 6.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1211 | 1174 |
| MMLU | 82% | 69.4% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.4% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 67.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 30.1% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 44.6% | — |

## Multimodal

- Amazon Nova Pro: 25.0 (#126)
- Command R+: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Command R+ |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 980 | — |

## Multilingual

- Amazon Nova Pro: 39.7 (#223)
- Command R+: 38.6 (#227)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Command R+ |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1234 | 1216 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1244 | 1226 |
| LMArena French | 1271 | 1209 |
| LMArena German | 1243 | 1216 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1200 | 1166 |
| LMArena Korean | 1203 | 1138 |
| LMArena Russian | 1240 | 1227 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1182 | 1189 |

## Instruction Following

- Amazon Nova Pro: 64.9 (#226)
- Command R+: 60.0 (#254)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Command R+ |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 67.1% | 57.6% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1235 | 1197 |
| IFEval | 81.5% | — |

## Long Context

- Amazon Nova Pro: 38.1 (#205)
- Command R+: 37.3 (#219)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Command R+ |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1255 | 1230 |

## Writing & Preference

- Amazon Nova Pro: 43.9 (#226)
- Command R+: 43.5 (#228)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Command R+ |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1259 | 1229 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1212 | 1235 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1246 | 1213 |
| LiveBench Language | 37% | 29.7% |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 60.5% | — |
| WildBench | 77.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Amazon Nova Pro better than Command R+?

Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index. Amazon Nova Pro costs 3.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Command R+'s lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Pro or Command R+?

Amazon Nova Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.80 per million input tokens and $3.20 per million output tokens; Command R+ lists at $2.50 and $10.

### Is Amazon Nova Pro or Command R+ better for coding?

Amazon Nova Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.1 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Amazon Nova Pro does, with 300K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Pro and Command R+ share?

27 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Pro has 38 scored results on Noometry and Command R+ has 34.