# Amazon Nova Pro vs Claude Opus 4

> Claude Opus 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index. Amazon Nova Pro costs 21× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Opus 4's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/amazon-nova-pro-vs-claude-opus-4
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 28

## Summary

- They share 28 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Claude Opus 4 in 10 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Claude Opus 4 leads 34.5 to 16.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Omni-MATH: 24.2% for Amazon Nova Pro and 61.6% for Claude Opus 4.
- Amazon Nova Pro is cheaper at $0.80 / $3.20 per million input/output tokens, against $15 / $75 for Claude Opus 4.
- Amazon Nova Pro accepts more context: 300K tokens versus 200K.

## Snapshot

| | Amazon Nova Pro | Claude Opus 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Anthropic |
| Noometry Index | 30.5 | 42.9 |
| Rank | 278 | 93 |
| Context | 300K | 200K |
| Input $/M | $0.80 | $15 |
| Output $/M | $3.20 | $75 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Amazon Nova Pro: 34.6 (#224)
- Claude Opus 4: 47.8 (#55)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Claude Opus 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1442 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 70.7% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 67.6% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 72% |
| GSO | — | 6.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 43.7% |
| LiveBench Coding | 38.1% | — |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.33 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Amazon Nova Pro: 16.6 (#139)
- Claude Opus 4: 34.5 (#39)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Claude Opus 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 25% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 1.7% | — |
| Cybench | — | 38% |
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 46.8% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1127 |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 63.9% |

## Reasoning

- Amazon Nova Pro: 19.2 (#240)
- Claude Opus 4: 27.4 (#104)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Claude Opus 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1246 | 1399 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 123.75 | 142.67 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 8.6% |
| SimpleBench | — | 58.8% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 74.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 35.7% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 5.6% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 32.6% | — |
| DTBench | — | 81.6% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 48.3% | — |
| LMCA | — | 37.4% |
| ForecastBench | — | 61.1 |
| LiveBench | 43.5% | — |

## Math

- Amazon Nova Pro: 26.4 (#240)
- Claude Opus 4: 40.2 (#80)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Claude Opus 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 24.2% | 61.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1252 | 1391 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 64.4% |
| LiveBench Math | 38% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 85% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 4.5% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 4.2% |

## Knowledge

- Amazon Nova Pro: 27.1 (#246)
- Claude Opus 4: 43.9 (#82)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Claude Opus 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.4% | 10.7% |
| MMLU-Pro | 67.3% | 87.5% |
| Confabulations | 30.1% | 15.9% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.1% | 12% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 44.6% | 70.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1211 | 1384 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 76.3% |
| MMLU | 82% | — |

## Multimodal

- Amazon Nova Pro: 24.5 (#121)
- Claude Opus 4: 30.9 (#101)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Claude Opus 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 980 | 1192 |
| GeoBench | — | 49% |
| VPCT | — | 38% |

## Multilingual

- Amazon Nova Pro: 39.9 (#218)
- Claude Opus 4: 49.0 (#133)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Claude Opus 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1234 | 1362 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1244 | 1386 |
| LMArena French | 1270 | 1370 |
| LMArena German | 1243 | 1391 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1200 | 1332 |
| LMArena Korean | 1203 | 1318 |
| LMArena Russian | 1240 | 1392 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1182 | 1388 |

## Instruction Following

- Amazon Nova Pro: 65.1 (#221)
- Claude Opus 4: 77.3 (#26)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Claude Opus 4 |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 81.5% | 91.8% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1235 | 1406 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 67.1% | — |

## Long Context

- Amazon Nova Pro: 38.1 (#199)
- Claude Opus 4: 39.5 (#167)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Claude Opus 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1255 | 1422 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 61.1% |

## Writing & Preference

- Amazon Nova Pro: 44.1 (#221)
- Claude Opus 4: 61.4 (#85)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Claude Opus 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1259 | 1377 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1212 | 1386 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 60.5% | 83.6% |
| WildBench | 77.7% | 85.2% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1245 | 1396 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1580 |
| LiveBench Language | 37% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Amazon Nova Pro better than Claude Opus 4?

Claude Opus 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index. Amazon Nova Pro costs 21× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Opus 4's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Pro or Claude Opus 4?

Amazon Nova Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.80 per million input tokens and $3.20 per million output tokens; Claude Opus 4 lists at $15 and $75.

### Is Amazon Nova Pro or Claude Opus 4 better for coding?

Claude Opus 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.8 versus 34.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Amazon Nova Pro does, with 300K tokens against 200K.

### How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Pro and Claude Opus 4 share?

28 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Pro has 38 scored results on Noometry and Claude Opus 4 has 56.