# Amazon Nova Micro vs Qwen3.7 Flash

> Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/amazon-nova-micro-vs-qwen3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 29.6.
- Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.035 / $0.14 for Amazon Nova Micro.
- Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.4 | 39.9 |
| Rank | 294 | 156 |
| Context | 128K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.035 | $0.03 |
| Output $/M | $0.14 | $0.13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Amazon Nova Micro: 30.5 (#295)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 20.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1218 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Amazon Nova Micro: 22.1 (#132)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 22.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Amazon Nova Micro: 17.4 (#294)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 25.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1191 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 34% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 144.64 |
| LiveBench | 29.6% | — |

## Math

- Amazon Nova Micro: 26.9 (#254)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| Omni-MATH | 21.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 34.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1206 | — |

## Knowledge

- Amazon Nova Micro: 29.6 (#237)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
| MMLU-Pro | 51.1% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 38.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1184 | — |
| MMLU | 70.8% | — |

## Multilingual

- Amazon Nova Micro: 36.5 (#239)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1209 | — |
| LMArena French | 1238 | — |
| LMArena German | 1192 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1154 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1150 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1185 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1225 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Amazon Nova Micro: 56.3 (#272)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 48% | — |
| IFEval | 76% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1174 | — |

## Long Context

- Amazon Nova Micro: 36.5 (#229)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1205 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Amazon Nova Micro: 39.5 (#247)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1208 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1172 | — |
| WildBench | 74.3% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1178 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 15.8% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Amazon Nova Micro better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Micro or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Amazon Nova Micro lists at $0.035 and $0.14.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Micro and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Micro has 32 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.