# Amazon Nova Micro vs Qwen3.5 35B-A3B

> Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index. Amazon Nova Micro costs 11× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.5 35B-A3B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/amazon-nova-micro-vs-qwen3-5-35b-a3b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Micro scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads 47.7 to 29.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Vectara Hallucination Rate: 5.5% for Amazon Nova Micro and 10.5% for Qwen3.5 35B-A3B.
- Amazon Nova Micro is cheaper at $0.035 / $0.14 per million input/output tokens, against $0.25 / $2 for Qwen3.5 35B-A3B.
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.9 | 41.7 |
| Rank | 290 | 118 |
| Context | 128K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.035 | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | $0.14 | $2 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Amazon Nova Micro: 30.0 (#289)
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 33.5 (#244)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1218 | 1410 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1254 |
| SciCode | — | 29.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | 20.2% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Amazon Nova Micro: 21.9 (#125)
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 22.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Amazon Nova Micro: 16.7 (#289)
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 23.9 (#158)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1191 | 1400 |
| CritPt | — | 0.6% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 10% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 25.1% | — |
| DTBench | — | 80% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 34% | — |
| LMCA | — | 29.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 142.52 |
| LiveBench | 29.6% | — |

## Math

- Amazon Nova Micro: 24.9 (#252)
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 38.4 (#86)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1206 | 1404 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 56% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 70% |
| Omni-MATH | 21.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 34.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Amazon Nova Micro: 29.2 (#231)
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 47.7 (#73)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.5% | 10.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1184 | 1408 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 83.5% |
| MMLU-Pro | 51.1% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 38.3% | — |
| MMLU | 70.8% | — |

## Multilingual

- Amazon Nova Micro: 36.7 (#234)
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 50.2 (#122)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1186 | 1379 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1209 | 1458 |
| LMArena French | 1237 | 1412 |
| LMArena German | 1192 | 1367 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1154 | 1326 |
| LMArena Korean | 1150 | 1354 |
| LMArena Russian | 1185 | 1377 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1225 | 1390 |

## Instruction Following

- Amazon Nova Micro: 56.6 (#267)
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 73.0 (#123)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1174 | 1379 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 48% | — |
| IFEval | 76% | — |

## Long Context

- Amazon Nova Micro: 36.5 (#224)
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 42.4 (#122)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1206 | 1390 |

## Writing & Preference

- Amazon Nova Micro: 39.7 (#242)
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 58.1 (#118)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1208 | 1395 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1172 | 1347 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1178 | 1391 |
| WildBench | 74.3% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 15.8% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Amazon Nova Micro better than Qwen3.5 35B-A3B?

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index. Amazon Nova Micro costs 11× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.5 35B-A3B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Micro or Qwen3.5 35B-A3B?

Amazon Nova Micro is cheaper. It lists at $0.035 per million input tokens and $0.14 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 35B-A3B lists at $0.25 and $2.

### Is Amazon Nova Micro or Qwen3.5 35B-A3B better for coding?

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.5 versus 30.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Micro and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Micro has 32 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B has 28.