# Amazon Nova Micro vs Qwen1.5-14B

> Qwen1.5-14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/amazon-nova-micro-vs-qwen1-5-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Micro scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen1.5-14B in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Micro leads 39.5 to 33.6.
- Qwen1.5-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.4 | 32.7 |
| Rank | 294 | 253 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.035 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.14 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Amazon Nova Micro: 30.5 (#295)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 33.1 (#263)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1218 | 1138 |
| LiveBench Coding | 20.2% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Amazon Nova Micro: 22.1 (#132)
- Qwen1.5-14B: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 22.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Amazon Nova Micro: 17.4 (#294)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 21.4 (#223)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1191 | 1113 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 25.1% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 34% | — |
| LiveBench | 29.6% | — |

## Math

- Amazon Nova Micro: 26.9 (#254)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 32.4 (#215)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1206 | 1125 |
| Omni-MATH | 21.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 34.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Amazon Nova Micro: 29.6 (#237)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 29.8 (#232)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1184 | 1094 |
| MMLU | 70.8% | 68.6% |
| MMLU-Pro | 51.1% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 38.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Amazon Nova Micro: 36.5 (#239)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 30.7 (#262)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1186 | 1095 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1209 | 1147 |
| LMArena French | 1238 | 1116 |
| LMArena German | 1192 | 1043 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1154 | 1019 |
| LMArena Russian | 1185 | 1046 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1225 | 1085 |
| LMArena Korean | 1150 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Amazon Nova Micro: 56.3 (#272)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 56.8 (#271)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1174 | 1102 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 48% | — |
| IFEval | 76% | — |

## Long Context

- Amazon Nova Micro: 36.5 (#229)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#257)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1205 | 1113 |

## Writing & Preference

- Amazon Nova Micro: 39.5 (#247)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 33.6 (#276)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1208 | 1128 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1172 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1178 | 1110 |
| WildBench | 74.3% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 15.8% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Amazon Nova Micro better than Qwen1.5-14B?

Qwen1.5-14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Amazon Nova Micro or Qwen1.5-14B better for coding?

Qwen1.5-14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.1 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Micro and Qwen1.5-14B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Micro has 32 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-14B has 17.