# Amazon Nova Micro vs Qwen-14B

> Amazon Nova Micro and Qwen-14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.9 vs 30.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/amazon-nova-micro-vs-qwen-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Micro scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen-14B in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Micro leads 39.7 to 27.8.
- Qwen-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.9 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 290 | 273 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.035 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.14 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Amazon Nova Micro: 30.0 (#289)
- Qwen-14B: 30.6 (#283)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1218 | 1072 |
| LiveBench Coding | 20.2% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Amazon Nova Micro: 21.9 (#125)
- Qwen-14B: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 22.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Amazon Nova Micro: 16.7 (#289)
- Qwen-14B: 18.7 (#255)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1191 | 1027 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 25.1% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 34% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 112.8 |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| LiveBench | 29.6% | — |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |

## Math

- Amazon Nova Micro: 24.9 (#252)
- Qwen-14B: 28.7 (#224)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1206 | 1068 |
| Omni-MATH | 21.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 34.5% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |

## Knowledge

- Amazon Nova Micro: 29.2 (#231)
- Qwen-14B: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 70.8% | 66.3% |
| MMLU-Pro | 51.1% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 38.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1184 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |

## Multilingual

- Amazon Nova Micro: 36.7 (#234)
- Qwen-14B: 27.7 (#270)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1186 | 1042 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1209 | 1077 |
| LMArena French | 1237 | — |
| LMArena German | 1192 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1154 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1150 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1185 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1225 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Amazon Nova Micro: 56.6 (#267)
- Qwen-14B: 52.6 (#284)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1174 | 1031 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 48% | — |
| IFEval | 76% | — |

## Long Context

- Amazon Nova Micro: 36.5 (#224)
- Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#276)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1206 | 1029 |

## Writing & Preference

- Amazon Nova Micro: 39.7 (#242)
- Qwen-14B: 27.8 (#294)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1208 | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1172 | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1178 | 1022 |
| WildBench | 74.3% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 15.8% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Amazon Nova Micro better than Qwen-14B?

Amazon Nova Micro and Qwen-14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.9 vs 30.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Amazon Nova Micro or Qwen-14B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (30.0 vs 30.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Micro and Qwen-14B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Micro has 32 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.