# Amazon Nova Micro vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

> Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/amazon-nova-micro-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Micro scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads 36.3 to 26.9.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Amazon Nova Micro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 30.4 | 37.9 |
| Rank | 294 | 191 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.035 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.14 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Amazon Nova Micro: 30.5 (#295)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1218 | 1291 |
| LiveBench Coding | 20.2% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Amazon Nova Micro: 22.1 (#132)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 22.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Amazon Nova Micro: 17.4 (#294)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1191 | 1272 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 25.1% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 34% | — |
| LiveBench | 29.6% | — |

## Math

- Amazon Nova Micro: 26.9 (#254)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1206 | 1305 |
| Omni-MATH | 21.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 34.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Amazon Nova Micro: 29.6 (#237)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1184 | 1295 |
| MMLU-Pro | 51.1% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 38.3% | — |
| MMLU | 70.8% | — |

## Multilingual

- Amazon Nova Micro: 36.5 (#239)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1186 | 1209 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1209 | 1242 |
| LMArena French | 1238 | 1260 |
| LMArena German | 1192 | 1262 |
| LMArena Russian | 1185 | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1225 | 1289 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1154 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1150 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Amazon Nova Micro: 56.3 (#272)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1174 | 1247 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 48% | — |
| IFEval | 76% | — |

## Long Context

- Amazon Nova Micro: 36.5 (#229)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1205 | 1272 |

## Writing & Preference

- Amazon Nova Micro: 39.5 (#247)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1208 | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1172 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1178 | 1252 |
| WildBench | 74.3% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 15.8% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Amazon Nova Micro better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Amazon Nova Micro or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Micro and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Micro has 32 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.