# Amazon Nova Micro vs Gemma 4 26B A4B IT

> Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index. Amazon Nova Micro costs 2.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemma 4 26B A4B IT's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/amazon-nova-micro-vs-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Micro scores higher in 0 categories and Gemma 4 26B A4B IT in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads 45.7 to 24.9.
- Amazon Nova Micro is cheaper at $0.035 / $0.14 per million input/output tokens, against $0.0765 / $0.26 for Gemma 4 26B A4B IT.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Amazon Nova Micro | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Google |
| Noometry Index | 29.9 | 43.1 |
| Rank | 290 | 88 |
| Context | 128K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.035 | $0.0765 |
| Output $/M | $0.14 | $0.26 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Amazon Nova Micro: 30.0 (#289)
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 38.8 (#156)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1218 | 1446 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1359 |
| SciCode | — | 40% |
| WeirdML | — | 35.2% |
| LiveBench Coding | 20.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 927.17 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Amazon Nova Micro: 21.9 (#125)
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 22.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Amazon Nova Micro: 16.7 (#289)
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.1 (#205)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1191 | 1438 |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 6% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 25.1% | — |
| DTBench | — | 74.9% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 34% | — |
| LMCA | — | 29.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 141.85 |
| LiveBench | 29.6% | — |

## Math

- Amazon Nova Micro: 24.9 (#252)
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#61)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1206 | 1469 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 82.2% |
| Omni-MATH | 21.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 34.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Amazon Nova Micro: 29.2 (#231)
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.6 (#79)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.5% | 5.2% |
| LMArena Expert | 1184 | 1447 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 73.2% |
| MMLU-Pro | 51.1% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 38.3% | — |
| MMLU | 70.8% | — |

## Multimodal

- Amazon Nova Micro: —
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.9 (#43)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1260 |

## Multilingual

- Amazon Nova Micro: 36.7 (#234)
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.3 (#68)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1186 | 1422 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1209 | 1495 |
| LMArena French | 1237 | 1459 |
| LMArena Russian | 1185 | 1434 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1225 | 1415 |
| LMArena German | 1192 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1154 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1150 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Amazon Nova Micro: 56.6 (#267)
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 75.0 (#78)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1174 | 1420 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 48% | — |
| IFEval | 76% | — |

## Long Context

- Amazon Nova Micro: 36.5 (#224)
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#87)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1206 | 1427 |

## Writing & Preference

- Amazon Nova Micro: 39.7 (#242)
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.8 (#110)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1208 | 1434 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1172 | 1401 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1178 | 1442 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1305 |
| WildBench | 74.3% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 15.8% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Amazon Nova Micro better than Gemma 4 26B A4B IT?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index. Amazon Nova Micro costs 2.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemma 4 26B A4B IT's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Micro or Gemma 4 26B A4B IT?

Amazon Nova Micro is cheaper. It lists at $0.035 per million input tokens and $0.14 per million output tokens; Gemma 4 26B A4B IT lists at $0.0765 and $0.26.

### Is Amazon Nova Micro or Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better for coding?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.8 versus 30.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Micro and Gemma 4 26B A4B IT share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Micro has 32 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28.