# Amazon Nova Micro vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

> Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index. Amazon Nova Micro costs 2.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/amazon-nova-micro-vs-gemini-2-5-flash-lite
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 24

## Summary

- They share 24 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Micro scores higher in 1 category and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads 56.8 to 39.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Omni-MATH: 21.4% for Amazon Nova Micro and 48% for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite.
- Amazon Nova Micro is cheaper at $0.035 / $0.14 per million input/output tokens, against $0.10 / $0.40 for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | Amazon Nova Micro | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Google |
| Noometry Index | 30.4 | 37.0 |
| Rank | 294 | 211 |
| Context | 128K | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $0.035 | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | $0.14 | $0.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Amazon Nova Micro: 30.5 (#295)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.5 (#173)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1218 | 1373 |
| WeirdML | — | 35.2% |
| LiveBench Coding | 20.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 325.9 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Amazon Nova Micro: 22.1 (#132)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.0 (#96)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 22.3% | 36.9% |

## Reasoning

- Amazon Nova Micro: 17.4 (#294)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 22.2 (#205)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1191 | 1377 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 40.5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 25.1% | — |
| DTBench | — | 62.8% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 34% | — |
| LMCA | — | 18.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 133.94 |
| LiveBench | 29.6% | — |

## Math

- Amazon Nova Micro: 26.9 (#254)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#144)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 21.4% | 48% |
| LMArena Math | 1206 | 1373 |
| LiveBench Math | 34.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Amazon Nova Micro: 29.6 (#237)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.5 (#210)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 51.1% | 53.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.5% | 3.3% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 38.3% | 30.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1184 | 1373 |
| MMLU | 70.8% | — |

## Multimodal

- Amazon Nova Micro: —
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 29.1 (#114)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1198 |
| VPCT | — | 30% |

## Multilingual

- Amazon Nova Micro: 36.5 (#239)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.3 (#134)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1186 | 1369 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1209 | 1404 |
| LMArena French | 1238 | 1388 |
| LMArena German | 1192 | 1389 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1154 | 1359 |
| LMArena Korean | 1150 | 1360 |
| LMArena Russian | 1185 | 1373 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1225 | 1396 |

## Instruction Following

- Amazon Nova Micro: 56.3 (#272)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.0 (#168)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 76% | 81% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1174 | 1367 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 48% | — |

## Long Context

- Amazon Nova Micro: 36.5 (#229)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#262)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1205 | 1373 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 47.2% |

## Writing & Preference

- Amazon Nova Micro: 39.5 (#247)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 56.8 (#135)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1208 | 1379 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1172 | 1367 |
| WildBench | 74.3% | 81.8% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1178 | 1366 |
| LiveBench Language | 15.8% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Amazon Nova Micro better than Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index. Amazon Nova Micro costs 2.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Micro or Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite?

Amazon Nova Micro is cheaper. It lists at $0.035 per million input tokens and $0.14 per million output tokens; Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite lists at $0.10 and $0.40.

### Is Amazon Nova Micro or Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better for coding?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Micro and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite share?

24 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Micro has 32 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33.