# Amazon Nova Micro vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

> DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index. Amazon Nova Micro costs 4.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when DeepSeek V4.1 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/amazon-nova-micro-vs-deepseek-v4-1-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Micro scores higher in 0 categories and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads 46.2 to 16.7.
- Amazon Nova Micro is cheaper at $0.035 / $0.14 per million input/output tokens, against $0.15 / $0.60 for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash.
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Amazon Nova Micro | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | DeepSeek |
| Noometry Index | 29.9 | 50.3 |
| Rank | 290 | 40 |
| Context | 128K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.035 | $0.15 |
| Output $/M | $0.14 | $0.60 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Amazon Nova Micro: 30.0 (#289)
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 52.8 (#29)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1218 | 1511 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1620 |
| SciCode | — | 51.9% |
| LiveBench Coding | 20.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,092 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Amazon Nova Micro: 21.9 (#125)
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 22.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Amazon Nova Micro: 16.7 (#289)
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 46.2 (#39)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1191 | 1485 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 89.6% |
| CritPt | — | 14.3% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 25.1% | — |
| DTBench | — | 89.9% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 34% | — |
| LMCA | — | 47% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 46.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 155.01 |
| LiveBench | 29.6% | — |

## Math

- Amazon Nova Micro: 24.9 (#252)
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 48.4 (#52)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1206 | 1493 |
| ProofBench | — | 54% |
| Omni-MATH | 21.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 34.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Amazon Nova Micro: 29.2 (#231)
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 41.6 (#97)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1184 | 1505 |
| MMLU-Pro | 51.1% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 38.3% | — |
| MMLU | 70.8% | — |

## Multilingual

- Amazon Nova Micro: 36.7 (#234)
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 55.5 (#29)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1186 | 1452 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1209 | 1506 |
| LMArena French | 1237 | 1448 |
| LMArena Russian | 1185 | 1473 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1225 | 1499 |
| LMArena German | 1192 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1154 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1150 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Amazon Nova Micro: 56.6 (#267)
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 77.6 (#24)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1174 | 1475 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 48% | — |
| IFEval | 76% | — |

## Long Context

- Amazon Nova Micro: 36.5 (#224)
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 45.2 (#46)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1206 | 1476 |

## Writing & Preference

- Amazon Nova Micro: 39.7 (#242)
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 65.8 (#43)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1208 | 1465 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1172 | 1436 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1178 | 1460 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1540 |
| WildBench | 74.3% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 15.8% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Amazon Nova Micro better than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index. Amazon Nova Micro costs 4.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when DeepSeek V4.1 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Micro or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?

Amazon Nova Micro is cheaper. It lists at $0.035 per million input tokens and $0.14 per million output tokens; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash lists at $0.15 and $0.60.

### Is Amazon Nova Micro or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better for coding?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.8 versus 30.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Micro and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Micro has 32 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has 25.