# Amazon Nova Lite vs Qwen3.6 Plus

> Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index. Amazon Nova Lite costs 11× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.6 Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/amazon-nova-lite-vs-qwen3-6-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Lite scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Plus in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Plus leads 56.1 to 26.3.
- Amazon Nova Lite is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.24 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $3 for Qwen3.6 Plus.
- Qwen3.6 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 300K.

## Snapshot

| | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 47.5 |
| Rank | 265 | 62 |
| Context | 300K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | $0.50 |
| Output $/M | $0.24 | $3 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Amazon Nova Lite: 32.5 (#270)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 40.8 (#130)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1239 | 1467 |
| ALE-Bench | 236.25 | 670.15 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 57.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1461 |
| SciCode | — | 40.7% |
| LiveBench Coding | 27.5% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Amazon Nova Lite: —
- Qwen3.6 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,115 |

## Reasoning

- Amazon Nova Lite: 19.3 (#260)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 29.3 (#93)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1220 | 1449 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 60.3% |
| CritPt | — | 2.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 17% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 59.5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 36.7% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 12% |
| DTBench | — | 81.9% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 37.2% | — |
| LMCA | — | 33.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.65 |
| LiveBench | 36.4% | — |

## Math

- Amazon Nova Lite: 27.8 (#247)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 51.8 (#54)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1227 | 1450 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 38.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
| Omni-MATH | 23.3% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 36.7% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 26.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 8.3% |

## Knowledge

- Amazon Nova Lite: 26.3 (#259)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 56.1 (#45)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1201 | 1454 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 88.4% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 3.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 44.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | 60% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.1% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 39.7% | — |
| MMLU | 77% | — |

## Multimodal

- Amazon Nova Lite: 25.5 (#123)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 990 | — |

## Multilingual

- Amazon Nova Lite: 38.0 (#232)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 53.3 (#70)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1208 | 1424 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1225 | 1477 |
| LMArena French | 1237 | 1455 |
| LMArena German | 1229 | 1452 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1153 | 1389 |
| LMArena Korean | 1153 | 1379 |
| LMArena Russian | 1216 | 1434 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1226 | 1432 |

## Instruction Following

- Amazon Nova Lite: 59.3 (#255)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 75.0 (#74)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1205 | 1425 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 54.1% | — |
| IFEval | 77.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Amazon Nova Lite: 37.4 (#217)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 45.2 (#49)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1234 | 1439 |
| CL-bench | — | 20.3% |

## Writing & Preference

- Amazon Nova Lite: 42.1 (#237)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 62.2 (#82)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1197 | 1404 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1199 | 1438 |
| WildBench | 75% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 25.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Amazon Nova Lite better than Qwen3.6 Plus?

Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index. Amazon Nova Lite costs 11× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.6 Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Lite or Qwen3.6 Plus?

Amazon Nova Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.24 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 Plus lists at $0.50 and $3.

### Is Amazon Nova Lite or Qwen3.6 Plus better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 32.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.6 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 300K.

### How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Lite and Qwen3.6 Plus share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Lite has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Plus has 37.