# Amazon Nova Lite vs Qwen3.5 397B-A17B

> Qwen3.5 397B-A17B is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.7 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index. Amazon Nova Lite costs 13× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.5 397B-A17B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/amazon-nova-lite-vs-qwen3-5-397b-a17b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Lite scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 397B-A17B in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads 53.3 to 26.0.
- Amazon Nova Lite is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.24 per million input/output tokens, against $0.60 / $3.60 for Qwen3.5 397B-A17B.
- Amazon Nova Lite accepts more context: 300K tokens versus 262K.
- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 45.7 |
| Rank | 262 | 60 |
| Context | 300K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | $0.60 |
| Output $/M | $0.24 | $3.60 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Amazon Nova Lite: 32.0 (#266)
- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 41.7 (#108)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1239 | 1464 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1400 |
| LiveBench Coding | 27.5% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 236.25 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Amazon Nova Lite: —
- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 33.2 (#51)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 24.9% |
| τ²-bench Airline | — | 81.5% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 9.8% |
| τ²-bench Retail | — | 84.4% |
| τ²-bench Telecom | — | 97.8% |

## Reasoning

- Amazon Nova Lite: 18.5 (#257)
- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 33.6 (#62)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1220 | 1448 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 73.7% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 58.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 13% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 65.1% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 36.7% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| DTBench | — | 87.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 37.2% | — |
| LMCA | — | 37.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.64 |
| LiveBench | 36.4% | — |

## Math

- Amazon Nova Lite: 25.8 (#243)
- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 44.9 (#64)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1227 | 1455 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 31.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 88.9% |
| Omni-MATH | 23.3% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 36.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Amazon Nova Lite: 26.0 (#254)
- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 53.3 (#53)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1201 | 1461 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 86.4% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 3.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 60% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.1% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 39.7% | — |
| MMLU | 77% | — |

## Multimodal

- Amazon Nova Lite: 25.0 (#118)
- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 40.0 (#42)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 990 | 1262 |

## Multilingual

- Amazon Nova Lite: 38.2 (#227)
- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 54.0 (#56)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1208 | 1431 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1225 | 1501 |
| LMArena French | 1237 | 1461 |
| LMArena German | 1229 | 1447 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1153 | 1427 |
| LMArena Korean | 1153 | 1382 |
| LMArena Russian | 1216 | 1429 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1225 | 1443 |

## Instruction Following

- Amazon Nova Lite: 59.6 (#250)
- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 75.2 (#73)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1205 | 1424 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 54.1% | — |
| IFEval | 77.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Amazon Nova Lite: 37.4 (#212)
- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 44.1 (#71)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1234 | 1442 |

## Writing & Preference

- Amazon Nova Lite: 42.3 (#232)
- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 62.5 (#74)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1438 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1197 | 1401 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1199 | 1447 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1478 |
| WildBench | 75% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 25.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Amazon Nova Lite better than Qwen3.5 397B-A17B?

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.7 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index. Amazon Nova Lite costs 13× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.5 397B-A17B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Lite or Qwen3.5 397B-A17B?

Amazon Nova Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.24 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 397B-A17B lists at $0.60 and $3.60.

### Is Amazon Nova Lite or Qwen3.5 397B-A17B better for coding?

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.7 versus 32.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Amazon Nova Lite does, with 300K tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Lite and Qwen3.5 397B-A17B share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Lite has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 397B-A17B has 36.