# Amazon Nova Lite vs Qwen3.5 27B

> Qwen3.5 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index. Amazon Nova Lite costs 7.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.5 27B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/amazon-nova-lite-vs-qwen3-5-27b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 20

## Summary

- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Lite scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 27B in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 27B leads 59.3 to 42.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Vectara Hallucination Rate: 6.1% for Amazon Nova Lite and 12.1% for Qwen3.5 27B.
- Amazon Nova Lite is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.24 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $2.40 for Qwen3.5 27B.
- Amazon Nova Lite accepts more context: 300K tokens versus 262K.
- Qwen3.5 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 41.9 |
| Rank | 265 | 127 |
| Context | 300K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | $0.24 | $2.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Amazon Nova Lite: 32.5 (#270)
- Qwen3.5 27B: 38.9 (#168)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1239 | 1427 |
| ALE-Bench | 236.25 | 349.45 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1358 |
| WeirdML | — | 39.5% |
| LiveBench Coding | 27.5% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Amazon Nova Lite: —
- Qwen3.5 27B: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 201.98 |

## Reasoning

- Amazon Nova Lite: 19.3 (#260)
- Qwen3.5 27B: 27.5 (#117)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1220 | 1414 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 47.9% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 36.7% | — |
| DTBench | — | 82.4% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 37.2% | — |
| LMCA | — | 34% |
| LiveBench | 36.4% | — |

## Math

- Amazon Nova Lite: 27.8 (#247)
- Qwen3.5 27B: 38.8 (#127)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1227 | 1429 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 56.7% |
| Omni-MATH | 23.3% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 36.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Amazon Nova Lite: 26.3 (#259)
- Qwen3.5 27B: 38.0 (#150)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.1% | 12.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1201 | 1428 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 3.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 60% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 39.7% | — |
| MMLU | 77% | — |

## Multimodal

- Amazon Nova Lite: 25.5 (#123)
- Qwen3.5 27B: 39.4 (#59)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 990 | 1241 |

## Multilingual

- Amazon Nova Lite: 38.0 (#232)
- Qwen3.5 27B: 50.8 (#115)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1208 | 1390 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1225 | 1478 |
| LMArena French | 1237 | 1410 |
| LMArena German | 1229 | 1393 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1153 | 1345 |
| LMArena Korean | 1153 | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | 1216 | 1390 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1226 | 1407 |

## Instruction Following

- Amazon Nova Lite: 59.3 (#255)
- Qwen3.5 27B: 73.5 (#119)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1205 | 1393 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 54.1% | — |
| IFEval | 77.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Amazon Nova Lite: 37.4 (#217)
- Qwen3.5 27B: 43.1 (#106)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1234 | 1413 |

## Writing & Preference

- Amazon Nova Lite: 42.1 (#237)
- Qwen3.5 27B: 59.3 (#111)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1409 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1197 | 1362 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1199 | 1410 |
| WildBench | 75% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 25.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Amazon Nova Lite better than Qwen3.5 27B?

Qwen3.5 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index. Amazon Nova Lite costs 7.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.5 27B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Lite or Qwen3.5 27B?

Amazon Nova Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.24 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 27B lists at $0.30 and $2.40.

### Is Amazon Nova Lite or Qwen3.5 27B better for coding?

Qwen3.5 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 32.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Amazon Nova Lite does, with 300K tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Lite and Qwen3.5 27B share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Lite has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 27B has 28.