# Amazon Nova Lite vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

> Amazon Nova Lite has enough public results to be ranked (#265); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/amazon-nova-lite-vs-qwen2-5-14b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Amazon Nova Lite scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads 37.7 to 32.5.
- Amazon Nova Lite is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.24 per million input/output tokens, against $0.35 / $1.40 for Qwen2.5 14B Instruct.
- Amazon Nova Lite accepts more context: 300K tokens versus 131K.
- Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 38.7 |
| Rank | 265 | — |
| Context | 300K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | $0.35 |
| Output $/M | $0.24 | $1.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Amazon Nova Lite: 32.5 (#270)
- Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: 37.7 (#191)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 39.8% |
| LiveBench Coding | 27.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1239 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.2% |
| ALE-Bench | 236.25 | — |

## Reasoning

- Amazon Nova Lite: 19.3 (#260)
- Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 36.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1220 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 37.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 36.4% | — |

## Math

- Amazon Nova Lite: 27.8 (#247)
- Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 23.3% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 36.7% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1227 | — |

## Knowledge

- Amazon Nova Lite: 26.3 (#259)
- Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 77% | 79.9% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 3.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 60% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.1% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 39.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1201 | — |

## Multimodal

- Amazon Nova Lite: 25.5 (#123)
- Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 990 | — |

## Multilingual

- Amazon Nova Lite: 38.0 (#232)
- Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1208 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1225 | — |
| LMArena French | 1237 | — |
| LMArena German | 1229 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1153 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1153 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1226 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Amazon Nova Lite: 59.3 (#255)
- Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 54.1% | — |
| IFEval | 77.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1205 | — |

## Long Context

- Amazon Nova Lite: 37.4 (#217)
- Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1234 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Amazon Nova Lite: 42.1 (#237)
- Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1197 | — |
| WildBench | 75% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1199 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 25.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Amazon Nova Lite better than Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?

Amazon Nova Lite has enough public results to be ranked (#265); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Lite or Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?

Amazon Nova Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.24 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5 14B Instruct lists at $0.35 and $1.40.

### Is Amazon Nova Lite or Qwen2.5 14B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 32.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Amazon Nova Lite does, with 300K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Lite and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Amazon Nova Lite has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has 3.