# Amazon Nova Lite vs Qwen Turbo

> Amazon Nova Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/amazon-nova-lite-vs-qwen-turbo
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Amazon Nova Lite leads 27.8 to 15.3.
- Qwen Turbo is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.06 / $0.24 for Amazon Nova Lite.
- Qwen Turbo accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 300K.

## Snapshot

| | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 27.1 |
| Rank | 265 | 335 |
| Context | 300K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | $0.05 |
| Output $/M | $0.24 | $0.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Amazon Nova Lite: 32.5 (#270)
- Qwen Turbo: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 27.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1239 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 236.25 | — |

## Reasoning

- Amazon Nova Lite: 19.3 (#260)
- Qwen Turbo: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 36.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1220 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 37.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 36.4% | — |

## Math

- Amazon Nova Lite: 27.8 (#247)
- Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.1% |
| Omni-MATH | 23.3% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 36.7% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1227 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.2% |

## Knowledge

- Amazon Nova Lite: 26.3 (#259)
- Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 3.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 60% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.1% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 39.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1201 | — |
| MMLU | 77% | — |

## Multimodal

- Amazon Nova Lite: 25.5 (#123)
- Qwen Turbo: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 990 | — |

## Multilingual

- Amazon Nova Lite: 38.0 (#232)
- Qwen Turbo: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1208 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1225 | — |
| LMArena French | 1237 | — |
| LMArena German | 1229 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1153 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1153 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1226 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Amazon Nova Lite: 59.3 (#255)
- Qwen Turbo: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 54.1% | — |
| IFEval | 77.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1205 | — |

## Long Context

- Amazon Nova Lite: 37.4 (#217)
- Qwen Turbo: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1234 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Amazon Nova Lite: 42.1 (#237)
- Qwen Turbo: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1197 | — |
| WildBench | 75% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1199 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 25.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Amazon Nova Lite better than Qwen Turbo?

Amazon Nova Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Lite or Qwen Turbo?

Qwen Turbo is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Amazon Nova Lite lists at $0.06 and $0.24.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen Turbo does, with 1M tokens against 300K.

### How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Lite and Qwen Turbo share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Lite has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.