# Amazon Nova Lite vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

> Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/amazon-nova-lite-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Lite scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads 35.0 to 26.0.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Amazon Nova Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 37.3 |
| Rank | 262 | 191 |
| Context | 300K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.24 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Amazon Nova Lite: 32.0 (#266)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.1 (#186)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1239 | 1292 |
| LiveBench Coding | 27.5% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 236.25 | — |

## Reasoning

- Amazon Nova Lite: 18.5 (#257)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 24.1 (#151)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1220 | 1272 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 36.7% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 37.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 36.4% | — |

## Math

- Amazon Nova Lite: 25.8 (#243)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 33.6 (#170)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1227 | 1305 |
| Omni-MATH | 23.3% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 36.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Amazon Nova Lite: 26.0 (#254)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.0 (#178)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1201 | 1294 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 3.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 60% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.1% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 39.7% | — |
| MMLU | 77% | — |

## Multimodal

- Amazon Nova Lite: 25.0 (#118)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 990 | — |

## Multilingual

- Amazon Nova Lite: 38.2 (#227)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.3 (#226)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1208 | 1210 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1225 | 1241 |
| LMArena French | 1237 | 1262 |
| LMArena German | 1229 | 1260 |
| LMArena Russian | 1216 | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1225 | 1288 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1153 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1153 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Amazon Nova Lite: 59.6 (#250)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.8 (#213)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1205 | 1246 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 54.1% | — |
| IFEval | 77.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Amazon Nova Lite: 37.4 (#212)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#190)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1234 | 1272 |

## Writing & Preference

- Amazon Nova Lite: 42.3 (#232)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.4 (#215)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1271 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1197 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1199 | 1252 |
| WildBench | 75% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 25.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Amazon Nova Lite better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Amazon Nova Lite or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 32.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Lite and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Lite has 34 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.