# Amazon Nova Lite vs Claude Opus 4.8

> Claude Opus 4.8 is the stronger model overall, scoring 60.7 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index. Amazon Nova Lite costs 95× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Opus 4.8's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/amazon-nova-lite-vs-claude-opus-4-8
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Lite scores higher in 0 categories and Claude Opus 4.8 in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Opus 4.8 leads 78.4 to 27.8.
- Amazon Nova Lite is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.24 per million input/output tokens, against $5 / $25 for Claude Opus 4.8.
- Claude Opus 4.8 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 300K.

## Snapshot

| | Amazon Nova Lite | Claude Opus 4.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Anthropic |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 60.7 |
| Rank | 265 | 13 |
| Context | 300K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | $5 |
| Output $/M | $0.24 | $25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Amazon Nova Lite: 32.5 (#270)
- Claude Opus 4.8: 59.9 (#12)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Claude Opus 4.8 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1239 | 1490 |
| ALE-Bench | 236.25 | 1,564 |
| DeepSWE | — | 59% |
| FrontierCode | — | 46.5% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1556 |
| SciCode | — | 53.5% |
| GSO | — | 47.1% |
| WeirdML | — | 82.9% |
| LiveBench Coding | 27.5% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Amazon Nova Lite: —
- Claude Opus 4.8: 47.6 (#11)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Claude Opus 4.8 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 48.9% |
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 20.6% |
| Remote Labor Index | — | 8.3% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 39.7% |
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 50.2% |
| PostTrainBench | — | 33.8% |
| GBAEval | — | 70.9% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 24% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1204 |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,787 |

## Reasoning

- Amazon Nova Lite: 19.3 (#260)
- Claude Opus 4.8: 64.7 (#16)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Claude Opus 4.8 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1220 | 1482 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 72.1% |
| SimpleBench | — | 64.8% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 88.8% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 91.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 92.5% |
| CritPt | — | 20.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 34% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 23.5% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 28.6% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 36.7% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 36% |
| DTBench | — | 94.9% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 37.2% | — |
| LMCA | — | 57.5% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 87.5% |
| Bench to the Future 3 | — | 0.14 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 158.21 |
| ForecastBench | — | 59.9 |
| LiveBench | 36.4% | — |

## Math

- Amazon Nova Lite: 27.8 (#247)
- Claude Opus 4.8: 78.4 (#13)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Claude Opus 4.8 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1227 | 1487 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 80% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 56.1% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 91.8% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 98.3% |
| ProofBench | — | 69% |
| Omni-MATH | 23.3% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 36.7% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 47.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 31.3% |

## Knowledge

- Amazon Nova Lite: 26.3 (#259)
- Claude Opus 4.8: 61.3 (#29)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Claude Opus 4.8 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1201 | 1502 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 91% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 3.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 53% |
| MMLU-Pro | 60% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.1% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 39.7% | — |
| MMLU | 77% | — |

## Multimodal

- Amazon Nova Lite: 25.5 (#123)
- Claude Opus 4.8: 42.9 (#26)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Claude Opus 4.8 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 990 | 1294 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 14.5% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 42.5% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1475 |

## Multilingual

- Amazon Nova Lite: 38.0 (#232)
- Claude Opus 4.8: 55.2 (#33)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Claude Opus 4.8 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1208 | 1450 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1225 | 1507 |
| LMArena French | 1237 | 1481 |
| LMArena German | 1229 | 1472 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1153 | 1440 |
| LMArena Korean | 1153 | 1432 |
| LMArena Russian | 1216 | 1474 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1226 | 1466 |

## Instruction Following

- Amazon Nova Lite: 59.3 (#255)
- Claude Opus 4.8: 77.4 (#24)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Claude Opus 4.8 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1205 | 1476 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 54.1% | — |
| IFEval | 77.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Amazon Nova Lite: 37.4 (#217)
- Claude Opus 4.8: 45.4 (#35)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Claude Opus 4.8 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1234 | 1483 |

## Writing & Preference

- Amazon Nova Lite: 42.1 (#237)
- Claude Opus 4.8: 72.0 (#16)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Claude Opus 4.8 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1461 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1197 | 1454 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1199 | 1476 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1840 |
| WildBench | 75% | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1281 |
| LiveBench Language | 25.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Amazon Nova Lite better than Claude Opus 4.8?

Claude Opus 4.8 is the stronger model overall, scoring 60.7 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index. Amazon Nova Lite costs 95× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Opus 4.8's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Lite or Claude Opus 4.8?

Amazon Nova Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.24 per million output tokens; Claude Opus 4.8 lists at $5 and $25.

### Is Amazon Nova Lite or Claude Opus 4.8 better for coding?

Claude Opus 4.8 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.9 versus 32.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Claude Opus 4.8 does, with 1M tokens against 300K.

### How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Lite and Claude Opus 4.8 share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Lite has 34 scored results on Noometry and Claude Opus 4.8 has 65.