# Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 vs Qwen Max

> Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.5 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/amazon-nova-experimental-chat-26-02-10-vs-qwen-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen Max in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads 39.3 to 22.3.

## Snapshot

| | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 44.5 | 34.7 |
| Rank | 77 | 230 |
| Context | — | 33K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.60 |
| Output $/M | — | $6.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 43.9 (#82)
- Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1483 | 1288 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 21.8% |

## Reasoning

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 30.1 (#86)
- Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1458 | 1269 |

## Math

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 39.3 (#109)
- Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1438 | 1275 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 16.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 67.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1% |

## Knowledge

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 42.3 (#97)
- Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1506 | 1248 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |

## Multilingual

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 54.0 (#50)
- Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1434 | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1463 | 1254 |
| LMArena Russian | 1423 | 1274 |
| LMArena French | — | 1330 |
| LMArena German | — | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1142 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1290 |

## Instruction Following

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 75.2 (#69)
- Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1427 | 1262 |

## Long Context

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 44.0 (#77)
- Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1441 | 1288 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |

## Writing & Preference

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 61.8 (#84)
- Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1368 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1442 | 1277 |

## FAQ

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 better than Qwen Max?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.5 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 or Qwen Max better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 and Qwen Max share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.
