# Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 vs Gemma 2B

> Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/amazon-nova-experimental-chat-26-02-10-vs-gemma-2b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher in 7 categories and Gemma 2B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads 62.0 to 24.1.
- Gemma 2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Google |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 29.1 |
| Rank | 77 | 305 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 43.2 (#81)
- Gemma 2B: 28.9 (#300)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1483 | 1010 |
| HumanEval+ | — | 20.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 34.1% |

## Reasoning

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 28.9 (#84)
- Gemma 2B: 17.9 (#275)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1458 | 989 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 35.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 93.57 |
| HellaSwag | — | 71.4% |
| PIQA | — | 77.3% |
| WinoGrande | — | 65.4% |

## Math

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 36.6 (#108)
- Gemma 2B: 27.6 (#237)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1440 | 1009 |
| GSM8K | — | 17.7% |

## Knowledge

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 41.6 (#98)
- Gemma 2B: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1505 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 42.1% |
| BoolQ | — | 69.4% |
| MMLU | — | 42.3% |
| TriviaQA | — | 53.2% |

## Multilingual

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 54.3 (#48)
- Gemma 2B: 23.1 (#289)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1435 | 958 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 986 |
| LMArena Russian | 1423 | 937 |

## Instruction Following

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 75.3 (#66)
- Gemma 2B: 48.8 (#297)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1426 | 971 |

## Long Context

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 44.0 (#73)
- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#286)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1441 | 981 |

## Writing & Preference

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 62.0 (#80)
- Gemma 2B: 24.1 (#303)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1449 | 1002 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1369 | 986 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1442 | 945 |

## FAQ

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 better than Gemma 2B?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 or Gemma 2B better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.2 versus 28.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 and Gemma 2B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2B has 23.