# Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 vs Gemma 7B

> Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/amazon-nova-experimental-chat-26-01-10-vs-gemma-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Gemma 7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads 57.6 to 27.2.
- Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Google |
| Noometry Index | 42.2 | 29.5 |
| Rank | 108 | 295 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.1 (#97)
- Gemma 7B: 29.9 (#290)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1447 | 1048 |
| HumanEval+ | — | 28.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 43.4% |

## Reasoning

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 27.8 (#97)
- Gemma 7B: 19.0 (#247)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1415 | 1042 |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 48.7% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 111.74 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.2% |
| PIQA | — | 81.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 79% |

## Math

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 35.8 (#136)
- Gemma 7B: 28.7 (#225)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1404 | 1066 |
| GSM8K | — | 46.4% |

## Knowledge

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 39.7 (#115)
- Gemma 7B: 26.8 (#248)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1445 | 1002 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 78.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 83.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.1% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 78.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 72.3% |

## Multilingual

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 50.4 (#121)
- Gemma 7B: 25.3 (#282)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1381 | 999 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1035 |
| LMArena Russian | 1393 | 993 |
| LMArena French | — | 1024 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1390 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 73.1 (#121)
- Gemma 7B: 51.7 (#290)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1381 | 1017 |

## Long Context

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#114)
- Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#277)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1401 | 1022 |

## Writing & Preference

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 57.6 (#123)
- Gemma 7B: 27.2 (#297)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1396 | 1056 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1331 | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1380 | 963 |

## FAQ

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 better than Gemma 7B?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 or Gemma 7B better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and Gemma 7B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 7B has 27.