# Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 vs Falcon-180B

> Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/amazon-nova-experimental-chat-26-01-10-vs-falcon-180b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 6

## Summary

- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 scores higher in 4 categories and Falcon-180B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads 57.4 to 29.1.
- Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Technology Innovation Institute |
| Noometry Index | 42.8 | 32.2 |
| Rank | 107 | 260 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#96)
- Falcon-180B: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1447 | — |

## Reasoning

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 28.9 (#98)
- Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1415 | 1007 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 112.13 |
| HellaSwag | — | 89% |
| LAMBADA | — | 79.8% |
| PIQA | — | 84.9% |
| WinoGrande | — | 87.1% |

## Math

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 38.5 (#136)
- Falcon-180B: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1404 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 54.4% |

## Knowledge

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 40.3 (#120)
- Falcon-180B: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1444 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 67.8% |
| BoolQ | — | 89% |
| MMLU | — | 70.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 64.2% |

## Multilingual

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 50.2 (#126)
- Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1381 | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1372 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1391 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1390 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 72.9 (#126)
- Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1381 | 1047 |

## Long Context

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#119)
- Falcon-180B: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1400 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 57.4 (#129)
- Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1396 | 1054 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1331 | 1089 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1380 | 1013 |

## FAQ

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 better than Falcon-180B?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and Falcon-180B share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Falcon-180B has 16.