# Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 vs Claude 3 Opus

> Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/amazon-nova-experimental-chat-26-01-10-vs-claude-3-opus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Claude 3 Opus in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads 38.5 to 14.8.

## Snapshot

| | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Claude 3 Opus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Anthropic |
| Noometry Index | 42.8 | 29.5 |
| Rank | 107 | 310 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#96)
- Claude 3 Opus: 32.9 (#267)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Claude 3 Opus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1447 | 1264 |
| WeirdML | — | 19.2% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45.5% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 38.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 57.4% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 77.4% |
| MBPP+ | — | 73.3% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: —
- Claude 3 Opus: 24.6 (#116)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Claude 3 Opus |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 10% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 29.5% |

## Reasoning

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 28.9 (#98)
- Claude 3 Opus: 14.6 (#324)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Claude 3 Opus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1415 | 1245 |
| SimpleBench | — | 23.5% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.8% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 40.6% |
| DTBench | — | 61.6% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 57.9% |
| LMCA | — | 17% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 126.91 |
| ForecastBench | — | 58.4 |
| LiveBench | — | 49.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 88.5% |

## Math

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 38.5 (#136)
- Claude 3 Opus: 14.8 (#299)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Claude 3 Opus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1404 | 1273 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 4.7% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 43.6% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 37.5% |

## Knowledge

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 40.3 (#120)
- Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#267)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Claude 3 Opus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1444 | 1223 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 47.2% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 12.6% |
| Confabulations | — | 22.7% |
| MMLU | — | 84.6% |

## Multimodal

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: —
- Claude 3 Opus: 27.1 (#116)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Claude 3 Opus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1023 |

## Multilingual

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 50.2 (#126)
- Claude 3 Opus: 41.4 (#207)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Claude 3 Opus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1381 | 1258 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1372 | 1248 |
| LMArena Russian | 1391 | 1280 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1390 | 1246 |
| LMArena French | — | 1275 |
| LMArena German | — | 1258 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1204 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1187 |

## Instruction Following

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 72.9 (#126)
- Claude 3 Opus: 64.1 (#228)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Claude 3 Opus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1381 | 1248 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 63.9% |

## Long Context

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#119)
- Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#202)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Claude 3 Opus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1400 | 1259 |

## Writing & Preference

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 57.4 (#129)
- Claude 3 Opus: 47.2 (#213)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Claude 3 Opus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1396 | 1262 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1331 | 1235 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1380 | 1275 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 50.4% |

## FAQ

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 better than Claude 3 Opus?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 or Claude 3 Opus better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and Claude 3 Opus share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Claude 3 Opus has 46.