# Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 vs Trinity Large Thinking

> Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/amazon-nova-experimental-chat-12-10-vs-trinity-large-thinking
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher in 7 categories and Trinity Large Thinking in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads 29.3 to 16.9.
- Trinity Large Thinking has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Arcee AI |
| Noometry Index | 42.9 | 38.6 |
| Rank | 104 | 185 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.80 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.2 (#110)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 34.1 (#244)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1430 | 1381 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1238 |
| SciCode | — | 36.1% |

## Reasoning

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 29.3 (#94)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 16.9 (#298)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1427 | 1350 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.6% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |

## Math

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 38.9 (#124)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 37.6 (#149)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1419 | 1366 |

## Knowledge

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 39.2 (#136)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 40.9 (#113)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1408 | 1360 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.9% |

## Multilingual

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 51.4 (#108)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 46.2 (#160)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | 1325 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1440 | 1373 |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | 1337 |
| LMArena French | — | 1374 |
| LMArena German | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1311 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1306 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1357 |

## Instruction Following

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 73.2 (#123)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 70.5 (#162)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1387 | 1334 |

## Long Context

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.4 (#125)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 41.3 (#144)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1391 | 1355 |

## Writing & Preference

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 59.5 (#110)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 53.8 (#158)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1350 | 1320 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1409 | 1342 |

## FAQ

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 better than Trinity Large Thinking?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.2 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Trinity Large Thinking share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.