# Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 vs Qwen3 8B

> Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/amazon-nova-experimental-chat-12-10-vs-qwen3-8b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads 29.3 to 16.6.
- Qwen3 8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.9 | 33.7 |
| Rank | 104 | 238 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.18 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.2 (#110)
- Qwen3 8B: 34.0 (#248)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 22.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1430 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: —
- Qwen3 8B: 30.2 (#78)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 42.6% |

## Reasoning

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 29.3 (#94)
- Qwen3 8B: 16.6 (#303)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1427 | — |
| DTBench | — | 59.7% |
| LMCA | — | 8.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 136.17 |

## Math

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 38.9 (#124)
- Qwen3 8B: 34.9 (#191)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 56.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1419 | — |

## Knowledge

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 39.2 (#136)
- Qwen3 8B: 36.1 (#173)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 4.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1408 | — |

## Multilingual

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 51.4 (#108)
- Qwen3 8B: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1440 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 73.2 (#123)
- Qwen3 8B: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1387 | — |

## Long Context

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.4 (#125)
- Qwen3 8B: 37.9 (#210)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.1% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1391 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 59.5 (#110)
- Qwen3 8B: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1350 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1409 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 better than Qwen3 8B?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 or Qwen3 8B better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.2 versus 34.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Qwen3 8B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 8B has 11.