# Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 vs Olmo 3 32b Think

> Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/amazon-nova-experimental-chat-12-10-vs-olmo-3-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads 59.7 to 49.2.
- Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 42.3 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 104 | 182 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 41.5 (#112)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.0 (#169)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1430 | 1318 |

## Reasoning

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 28.1 (#93)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 24.9 (#138)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1427 | 1302 |

## Math

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 36.1 (#130)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 33.8 (#165)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1418 | 1315 |

## Knowledge

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 38.6 (#133)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 34.4 (#189)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1409 | 1272 |

## Multilingual

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 51.7 (#103)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.4 (#205)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1399 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1440 | 1300 |
| LMArena Russian | 1397 | 1255 |
| LMArena French | — | 1291 |
| LMArena German | — | 1290 |

## Instruction Following

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 73.4 (#117)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.4 (#193)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1387 | 1275 |

## Long Context

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.4 (#120)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#177)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1391 | 1296 |

## Writing & Preference

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 59.7 (#104)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.2 (#188)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1351 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1409 | 1289 |

## FAQ

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 better than Olmo 3 32b Think?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.5 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Olmo 3 32b Think share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.