# Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 vs GPT-5.1-Codex

> Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 38.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/amazon-nova-experimental-chat-12-10-vs-gpt-5-1-codex
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads 36.1 to 29.3.

## Snapshot

| | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-5.1-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 42.3 | 38.2 |
| Rank | 104 | 178 |
| Context | — | 400K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $10 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 41.5 (#112)
- GPT-5.1-Codex: 41.7 (#107)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-5.1-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 66% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1337 |
| LMArena Coding | 1430 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,245 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: —
- GPT-5.1-Codex: 37.8 (#32)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-5.1-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 60.4% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 70.8% |

## Reasoning

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 28.1 (#93)
- GPT-5.1-Codex: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-5.1-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1427 | — |

## Math

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 36.1 (#130)
- GPT-5.1-Codex: 29.3 (#218)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-5.1-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 9% |
| LMArena Math | 1418 | — |

## Knowledge

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 38.6 (#133)
- GPT-5.1-Codex: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-5.1-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1409 | — |

## Multilingual

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 51.7 (#103)
- GPT-5.1-Codex: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-5.1-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1399 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1440 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1397 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 73.4 (#117)
- GPT-5.1-Codex: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-5.1-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1387 | — |

## Long Context

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.4 (#120)
- GPT-5.1-Codex: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-5.1-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1391 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 59.7 (#104)
- GPT-5.1-Codex: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-5.1-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1409 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 better than GPT-5.1-Codex?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 38.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 or GPT-5.1-Codex better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (41.5 vs 41.7); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and GPT-5.1-Codex share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.1-Codex has 6.