# Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 vs Falcon-180B

> Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/amazon-nova-experimental-chat-12-10-vs-falcon-180b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 6

## Summary

- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher in 4 categories and Falcon-180B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads 59.7 to 29.3.
- Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Technology Innovation Institute |
| Noometry Index | 42.3 | 31.8 |
| Rank | 104 | 254 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 41.5 (#112)
- Falcon-180B: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1430 | — |

## Reasoning

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 28.1 (#93)
- Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1427 | 1007 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 111.89 |
| HellaSwag | — | 89% |
| LAMBADA | — | 79.8% |
| PIQA | — | 84.9% |
| WinoGrande | — | 87.1% |

## Math

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 36.1 (#130)
- Falcon-180B: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1418 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 54.4% |

## Knowledge

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 38.6 (#133)
- Falcon-180B: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1409 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 67.8% |
| BoolQ | — | 89% |
| MMLU | — | 70.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 64.2% |

## Multilingual

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 51.7 (#103)
- Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1399 | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1440 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1397 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 73.4 (#117)
- Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1387 | 1047 |

## Long Context

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.4 (#120)
- Falcon-180B: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1391 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 59.7 (#104)
- Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | 1054 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1351 | 1089 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1409 | 1013 |

## FAQ

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 better than Falcon-180B?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Falcon-180B share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Falcon-180B has 16.