# Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 vs Claude Opus 4

> Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Claude Opus 4 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.9 vs 43.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/amazon-nova-experimental-chat-12-10-vs-claude-opus-4
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher in 3 categories and Claude Opus 4 in 5 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Claude Opus 4 leads 47.2 to 42.2.

## Snapshot

| | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Claude Opus 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Anthropic |
| Noometry Index | 42.9 | 43.1 |
| Rank | 104 | 100 |
| Context | — | 200K |
| Input $/M | — | $15 |
| Output $/M | — | $75 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.2 (#110)
- Claude Opus 4: 47.2 (#62)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Claude Opus 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1430 | 1442 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 70.7% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 67.6% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 72% |
| GSO | — | 6.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 43.7% |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.33 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: —
- Claude Opus 4: 34.8 (#42)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Claude Opus 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 38% |
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 46.8% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1127 |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 63.9% |

## Reasoning

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 29.3 (#94)
- Claude Opus 4: 27.3 (#121)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Claude Opus 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1427 | 1399 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 8.6% |
| SimpleBench | — | 58.8% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 74.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 35.7% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 5.6% |
| DTBench | — | 81.6% |
| LMCA | — | 37.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 142.67 |
| ForecastBench | — | 61.1 |

## Math

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 38.9 (#124)
- Claude Opus 4: 42.0 (#86)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Claude Opus 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1419 | 1390 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 64.4% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 61.6% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 85% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 4.5% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 4.2% |

## Knowledge

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 39.2 (#136)
- Claude Opus 4: 44.0 (#88)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Claude Opus 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1408 | 1386 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 76.3% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 10.7% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 87.5% |
| Confabulations | — | 15.9% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 70.8% |

## Multimodal

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: —
- Claude Opus 4: 31.5 (#106)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Claude Opus 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1192 |
| GeoBench | — | 49% |
| VPCT | — | 38% |

## Multilingual

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 51.4 (#108)
- Claude Opus 4: 48.8 (#138)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Claude Opus 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | 1362 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1440 | 1386 |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | 1392 |
| LMArena French | — | 1372 |
| LMArena German | — | 1391 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1331 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1321 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1389 |

## Instruction Following

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 73.2 (#123)
- Claude Opus 4: 77.1 (#28)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Claude Opus 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1387 | 1406 |
| IFEval | — | 91.8% |

## Long Context

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.4 (#125)
- Claude Opus 4: 39.6 (#172)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Claude Opus 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1391 | 1422 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 61.1% |

## Writing & Preference

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 59.5 (#110)
- Claude Opus 4: 61.2 (#89)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Claude Opus 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | 1377 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1350 | 1387 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1409 | 1396 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 83.6% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1580 |
| WildBench | — | 85.2% |

## FAQ

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 better than Claude Opus 4?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Claude Opus 4 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.9 vs 43.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 or Claude Opus 4 better for coding?

Claude Opus 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.2 versus 42.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Claude Opus 4 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Claude Opus 4 has 56.