# Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

> Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 39.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/amazon-nova-experimental-chat-12-10-vs-claude-3-7-sonnet
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher in 6 categories and Claude 3.7 Sonnet in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads 29.3 to 18.6.

## Snapshot

| | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Anthropic |
| Noometry Index | 42.9 | 39.5 |
| Rank | 104 | 164 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.2 (#110)
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 40.6 (#136)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1430 | 1361 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 61% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 52.8% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 64.9% |
| GSO | — | 3.8% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 74.5% |
| CadEval | — | 54% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: —
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 34.1 (#50)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 30.9% |
| Cybench | — | 20% |
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 43.6% |
| OSWorld | — | 35.8% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 60% |

## Reasoning

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 29.3 (#94)
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 18.6 (#277)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1427 | 1333 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0.9% |
| SimpleBench | — | 46.4% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 28.6% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 4.2% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 87.8% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 74% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 141.16 |
| ForecastBench | — | 61.8 |
| LiveBench | — | 76.1% |

## Math

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 38.9 (#124)
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 37.5 (#153)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1419 | 1337 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 57.8% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 33% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 79% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 91.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 4.1% |

## Knowledge

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 39.2 (#136)
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 39.8 (#130)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1408 | 1321 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 79.7% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 78.4% |
| Confabulations | — | 14.7% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 60.8% |

## Multimodal

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: —
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 33.7 (#95)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1169 |
| GeoBench | — | 68% |
| VPCT | — | 39% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 33.9% |

## Multilingual

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 51.4 (#108)
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 44.1 (#179)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | 1296 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1440 | 1299 |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | 1311 |
| LMArena French | — | 1303 |
| LMArena German | — | 1301 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1267 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1249 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1298 |

## Instruction Following

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 73.2 (#123)
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 72.9 (#125)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1387 | 1352 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.3% |
| IFEval | — | 83.4% |

## Long Context

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.4 (#125)
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 50.3 (#10)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1391 | 1373 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |

## Writing & Preference

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 59.5 (#110)
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 54.4 (#150)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | 1314 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1350 | 1332 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1409 | 1339 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 81.1% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1412 |
| WildBench | — | 81.4% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 59.9% |

## FAQ

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 better than Claude 3.7 Sonnet?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 39.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 or Claude 3.7 Sonnet better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.2 versus 40.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Claude 3.7 Sonnet share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Claude 3.7 Sonnet has 58.