# Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 vs Qwen2-72B

> Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/amazon-nova-experimental-chat-11-10-vs-qwen2-72b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2-72B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads 39.9 to 21.2.
- Qwen2-72B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.0 | 30.0 |
| Rank | 101 | 300 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 42.3 (#107)
- Qwen2-72B: 29.1 (#310)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1433 | 1196 |
| WeirdML | — | 11.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 38.5% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: —
- Qwen2-72B: 17.0 (#146)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 1.1% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 29.9% |

## Reasoning

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 29.1 (#95)
- Qwen2-72B: 23.2 (#181)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1422 | 1191 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.28 |

## Math

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 39.1 (#114)
- Qwen2-72B: 30.2 (#236)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1431 | 1235 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.1% |

## Knowledge

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 39.9 (#127)
- Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#275)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1431 | 1171 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 40.8% |
| MMLU | — | 82.4% |

## Multilingual

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 51.9 (#98)
- Qwen2-72B: 35.9 (#244)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1405 | 1176 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1463 | 1240 |
| LMArena French | 1449 | 1170 |
| LMArena German | 1395 | 1151 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1383 | 1111 |
| LMArena Korean | 1384 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 1394 | 1169 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1444 | 1169 |

## Instruction Following

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 73.2 (#122)
- Qwen2-72B: 61.7 (#241)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1387 | 1181 |

## Long Context

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 42.5 (#121)
- Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#235)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1395 | 1192 |

## Writing & Preference

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 58.8 (#114)
- Qwen2-72B: 40.8 (#241)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1415 | 1203 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1349 | 1181 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1380 | 1196 |

## FAQ

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 better than Qwen2-72B?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 or Qwen2-72B better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 and Qwen2-72B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.