# Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 vs Wizardlm 13b

> Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/amazon-nova-experimental-chat-10-20-vs-wizardlm-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads 56.9 to 30.7.
- Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 122 | 272 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.0 (#123)
- Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1413 | 1035 |

## Reasoning

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 27.3 (#110)
- Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1396 | 1018 |

## Math

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 36.2 (#121)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1425 | 1017 |

## Knowledge

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 37.8 (#142)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1385 | — |

## Multilingual

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 49.7 (#127)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1372 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1405 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1426 | — |
| LMArena German | 1391 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1327 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1371 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1381 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 72.3 (#136)
- Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1365 | 1049 |

## Long Context

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.7 (#128)
- Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1370 | 1054 |

## Writing & Preference

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 56.9 (#131)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1394 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1318 | 1090 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1364 | 1047 |

## FAQ

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 better than Wizardlm 13b?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.0 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.