# Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 vs Qwen Max

> Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 34.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/amazon-nova-experimental-chat-10-20-vs-qwen-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen Max in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads 36.2 to 21.0.

## Snapshot

| | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 34.4 |
| Rank | 122 | 226 |
| Context | — | 33K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.60 |
| Output $/M | — | $6.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.0 (#123)
- Qwen Max: 30.3 (#288)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1413 | 1288 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 21.8% |

## Reasoning

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 27.3 (#110)
- Qwen Max: 24.1 (#154)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1396 | 1270 |

## Math

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 36.2 (#121)
- Qwen Max: 21.0 (#272)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1425 | 1275 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 16.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 67.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1% |

## Knowledge

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 37.8 (#142)
- Qwen Max: 30.3 (#222)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1385 | 1248 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |

## Multilingual

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 49.7 (#127)
- Qwen Max: 42.0 (#197)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1372 | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1405 | 1254 |
| LMArena French | 1426 | 1329 |
| LMArena German | 1391 | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1355 | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | 1327 | 1141 |
| LMArena Russian | 1371 | 1274 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1381 | 1290 |

## Instruction Following

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 72.3 (#136)
- Qwen Max: 66.7 (#203)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1365 | 1262 |

## Long Context

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.7 (#128)
- Qwen Max: 39.4 (#175)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1370 | 1289 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |

## Writing & Preference

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 56.9 (#131)
- Qwen Max: 48.0 (#200)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1394 | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1318 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1364 | 1277 |

## FAQ

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 better than Qwen Max?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 34.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 or Qwen Max better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.0 versus 30.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and Qwen Max share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.