# Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 vs Qwen-14B

> Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/amazon-nova-experimental-chat-10-20-vs-qwen-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen-14B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads 56.6 to 27.6.
- Qwen-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.1 | 31.4 |
| Rank | 118 | 275 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.6 (#123)
- Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1412 | 1071 |

## Reasoning

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 28.4 (#106)
- Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1396 | 1027 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 113.03 |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |

## Math

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 39.0 (#119)
- Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1425 | 1068 |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |

## Knowledge

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 38.5 (#144)
- Qwen-14B: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1386 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.3% |

## Multilingual

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 49.5 (#131)
- Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1372 | 1041 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1404 | 1077 |
| LMArena French | 1425 | — |
| LMArena German | 1391 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1360 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1324 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1371 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1382 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 72.1 (#141)
- Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1365 | 1031 |

## Long Context

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.7 (#133)
- Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1370 | 1028 |

## Writing & Preference

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 56.6 (#136)
- Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1394 | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1318 | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1364 | 1022 |

## FAQ

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 better than Qwen-14B?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 or Qwen-14B better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.6 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and Qwen-14B share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.