# Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 vs DeepSeek LLM 67B

> Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/amazon-nova-experimental-chat-10-20-vs-deepseek-llm-67b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 scores higher in 8 categories and DeepSeek LLM 67B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads 38.5 to 7.0.
- DeepSeek LLM 67B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | DeepSeek |
| Noometry Index | 42.1 | 24.9 |
| Rank | 118 | 347 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.6 (#123)
- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1412 | 1096 |

## Reasoning

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 28.4 (#106)
- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1396 | 1070 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 110.5 |

## Math

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 39.0 (#119)
- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1425 | 1108 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 0.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 6.4% |

## Knowledge

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 38.5 (#144)
- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 24.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1386 | — |

## Multilingual

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 49.5 (#131)
- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1372 | 1073 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1404 | 1132 |
| LMArena French | 1425 | — |
| LMArena German | 1391 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1360 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1324 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1371 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1382 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 72.1 (#141)
- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1365 | 1079 |

## Long Context

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.7 (#133)
- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1370 | 1092 |

## Writing & Preference

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 56.6 (#136)
- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1394 | 1105 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1318 | 1067 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1364 | 1082 |

## FAQ

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 better than DeepSeek LLM 67B?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 or DeepSeek LLM 67B better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.6 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and DeepSeek LLM 67B share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 has 17 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15.