# Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs Trinity Large Thinking

> Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/amazon-nova-experimental-chat-10-09-vs-trinity-large-thinking
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher in 4 categories and Trinity Large Thinking in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads 26.2 to 16.3.
- Trinity Large Thinking has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Arcee AI |
| Noometry Index | 41.4 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 124 | 180 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.80 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 39.6 (#142)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 33.8 (#238)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1371 | 1381 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1238 |
| SciCode | — | 36.1% |

## Reasoning

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 26.2 (#122)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 16.3 (#298)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1350 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.6% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |

## Math

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —
- Trinity Large Thinking: 34.9 (#149)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1366 |

## Knowledge

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —
- Trinity Large Thinking: 40.3 (#107)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1359 |

## Multilingual

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.5 (#145)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 46.4 (#155)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1341 | 1325 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1345 | 1372 |
| LMArena French | — | 1374 |
| LMArena German | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1312 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1304 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1338 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1356 |

## Instruction Following

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.7 (#167)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 70.7 (#157)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1316 | 1334 |

## Long Context

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.6 (#146)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 41.2 (#139)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1355 |

## Writing & Preference

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 55.0 (#144)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 54.0 (#152)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1365 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1307 | 1321 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1354 | 1342 |

## FAQ

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than Trinity Large Thinking?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.6 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Trinity Large Thinking share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.