# Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs Qwen3.7 Max

> Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 41.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/amazon-nova-experimental-chat-10-09-vs-qwen3-7-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Max in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 49.2 to 27.3.

## Snapshot

| | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.9 | 51.5 |
| Rank | 126 | 42 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $2.50 |
| Output $/M | — | $7.50 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.2 (#145)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 50.4 (#45)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1370 | 1498 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 77.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1515 |
| SciCode | — | 48.8% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,189 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —
- Qwen3.7 Max: 22.1 (#135)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | — | 0.4% |

## Reasoning

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 27.3 (#120)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 49.2 (#38)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1483 |
| SimpleBench | — | 70.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 85.1% |
| CritPt | — | 13.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 19% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 9.5% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 32% |
| DTBench | — | 92.3% |
| LMCA | — | 44% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 153.68 |

## Math

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —
- Qwen3.7 Max: 62.4 (#32)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 64.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 34.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 95.6% |
| ProofBench | — | 26% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1490 |

## Knowledge

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —
- Qwen3.7 Max: 61.6 (#28)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 90.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 55.8% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1488 |

## Multilingual

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.3 (#150)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 56.9 (#15)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1340 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1341 | 1530 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1484 |

## Instruction Following

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.4 (#172)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 76.7 (#38)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1315 | 1460 |

## Long Context

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.5 (#152)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#40)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1333 | 1482 |

## Writing & Preference

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 54.7 (#149)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 65.0 (#54)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1364 | 1476 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1307 | 1449 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1355 | 1481 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1110 |

## FAQ

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 41.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.4 versus 40.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Qwen3.7 Max share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.