# Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs Qwen Max

> Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 34.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/amazon-nova-experimental-chat-10-09-vs-qwen-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen Max in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads 39.6 to 30.3.

## Snapshot

| | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.4 | 34.4 |
| Rank | 124 | 226 |
| Context | — | 33K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.60 |
| Output $/M | — | $6.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 39.6 (#142)
- Qwen Max: 30.3 (#288)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1371 | 1288 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 21.8% |

## Reasoning

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 26.2 (#122)
- Qwen Max: 24.1 (#154)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1270 |

## Math

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —
- Qwen Max: 21.0 (#272)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 16.1% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1275 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 67.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1% |

## Knowledge

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —
- Qwen Max: 30.3 (#222)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1248 |

## Multilingual

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.5 (#145)
- Qwen Max: 42.0 (#197)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1341 | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1345 | 1254 |
| LMArena French | — | 1329 |
| LMArena German | — | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1141 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1274 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1290 |

## Instruction Following

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.7 (#167)
- Qwen Max: 66.7 (#203)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1316 | 1262 |

## Long Context

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.6 (#146)
- Qwen Max: 39.4 (#175)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1289 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |

## Writing & Preference

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 55.0 (#144)
- Qwen Max: 48.0 (#200)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1365 | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1307 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1354 | 1277 |

## FAQ

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than Qwen Max?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 34.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or Qwen Max better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.6 versus 30.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Qwen Max share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.