# Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs phi-3-medium 14B

> Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/amazon-nova-experimental-chat-10-09-vs-phi-3-medium-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads 39.6 to 36.3.
- phi-3-medium 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 41.4 | 29.1 |
| Rank | 124 | 306 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 39.6 (#142)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 36.3 (#198)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1371 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |

## Reasoning

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 26.2 (#122)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 121.18 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |

## Math

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —
- phi-3-medium 14B: 25.2 (#249)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |

## Knowledge

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —
- phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#301)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |

## Multilingual

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.5 (#145)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1345 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.7 (#167)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1316 | — |

## Long Context

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.6 (#146)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 55.0 (#144)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1365 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1307 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1354 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than phi-3-medium 14B?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.6 versus 36.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and phi-3-medium 14B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.