# Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs GLM-4.7-Flash

> Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/amazon-nova-experimental-chat-10-09-vs-glm-4-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher in 3 categories and GLM-4.7-Flash in 3 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads 54.7 to 47.4.
- GLM-4.7-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 41.9 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 126 | 180 |
| Context | — | 200K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.06 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.2 (#145)
- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.6 (#135)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1370 | 1383 |

## Reasoning

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 27.3 (#120)
- GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.9 (#229)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1356 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |

## Math

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —
- GLM-4.7-Flash: 36.1 (#173)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 58.3% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1355 |

## Knowledge

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —
- GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.5 (#184)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 60.5% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1357 |

## Multilingual

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.3 (#150)
- GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.5 (#158)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1340 | 1330 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1341 | 1403 |
| LMArena French | — | 1332 |
| LMArena German | — | 1337 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1283 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1332 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1350 |

## Instruction Following

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.4 (#172)
- GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.1 (#167)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1315 | 1327 |

## Long Context

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.5 (#152)
- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#148)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1333 | 1345 |

## Writing & Preference

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 54.7 (#149)
- GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.4 (#210)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1364 | 1351 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1307 | 1297 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1355 | 1342 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1125 |

## FAQ

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than GLM-4.7-Flash?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or GLM-4.7-Flash better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (40.2 vs 40.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and GLM-4.7-Flash share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.7-Flash has 21.