# Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs Gemma 3 27B

> Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/amazon-nova-experimental-chat-10-09-vs-gemma-3-27b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher in 5 categories and Gemma 3 27B in 1 category; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads 40.2 to 22.5.
- Gemma 3 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Google |
| Noometry Index | 41.9 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 126 | 284 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.08 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.2 (#145)
- Gemma 3 27B: 22.5 (#334)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1370 | 1322 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 4.9% |
| SciCode | — | 21.2% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 39.9% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —
- Gemma 3 27B: 25.1 (#110)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 29.5% |

## Reasoning

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 27.3 (#120)
- Gemma 3 27B: 16.7 (#301)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1340 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 40.4% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 43.8% |
| DTBench | — | 52.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 51.5% |
| LMCA | — | 12.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 130.04 |
| LiveBench | — | 50% |

## Math

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —
- Gemma 3 27B: 25.9 (#265)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 22.5% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 55.4% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1312 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 74% |

## Knowledge

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —
- Gemma 3 27B: 25.5 (#261)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 47.7% |
| Confabulations | — | 40.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7.4% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1304 |

## Multimodal

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —
- Gemma 3 27B: 32.6 (#100)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1164 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |

## Multilingual

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.3 (#150)
- Gemma 3 27B: 46.9 (#155)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1340 | 1334 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1341 | 1346 |
| LMArena French | — | 1368 |
| LMArena German | — | 1362 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1287 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1308 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1349 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1349 |

## Instruction Following

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.4 (#172)
- Gemma 3 27B: 70.6 (#160)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1315 | 1321 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 74.9% |

## Long Context

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.5 (#152)
- Gemma 3 27B: 27.6 (#293)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1333 | 1333 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 33.3% |

## Writing & Preference

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 54.7 (#149)
- Gemma 3 27B: 52.5 (#168)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1364 | 1358 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1307 | 1346 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1355 | 1345 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 79.9% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1266 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 34.6% |

## FAQ

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than Gemma 3 27B?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or Gemma 3 27B better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 22.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Gemma 3 27B share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3 27B has 43.