# Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs Gemma 2B

> Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/amazon-nova-experimental-chat-10-09-vs-gemma-2b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher in 6 categories and Gemma 2B in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads 55.0 to 24.1.
- Gemma 2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Google |
| Noometry Index | 41.4 | 29.1 |
| Rank | 124 | 305 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 39.6 (#142)
- Gemma 2B: 28.9 (#300)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1371 | 1010 |
| HumanEval+ | — | 20.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 34.1% |

## Reasoning

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 26.2 (#122)
- Gemma 2B: 17.9 (#275)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 989 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 35.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 93.57 |
| HellaSwag | — | 71.4% |
| PIQA | — | 77.3% |
| WinoGrande | — | 65.4% |

## Math

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —
- Gemma 2B: 27.6 (#237)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1009 |
| GSM8K | — | 17.7% |

## Knowledge

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —
- Gemma 2B: —

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 42.1% |
| BoolQ | — | 69.4% |
| MMLU | — | 42.3% |
| TriviaQA | — | 53.2% |

## Multilingual

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.5 (#145)
- Gemma 2B: 23.1 (#289)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1341 | 958 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1345 | 986 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 937 |

## Instruction Following

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.7 (#167)
- Gemma 2B: 48.8 (#297)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1316 | 971 |

## Long Context

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.6 (#146)
- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#286)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 981 |

## Writing & Preference

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 55.0 (#144)
- Gemma 2B: 24.1 (#303)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1365 | 1002 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1307 | 986 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1354 | 945 |

## FAQ

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than Gemma 2B?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or Gemma 2B better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.6 versus 28.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Gemma 2B share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2B has 23.