# Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs DeepSeek LLM 67B

> Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/amazon-nova-experimental-chat-10-09-vs-deepseek-llm-67b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher in 6 categories and DeepSeek LLM 67B in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads 54.7 to 31.6.
- DeepSeek LLM 67B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | DeepSeek |
| Noometry Index | 41.9 | 24.9 |
| Rank | 126 | 347 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.2 (#145)
- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1370 | 1096 |

## Reasoning

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 27.3 (#120)
- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1070 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 110.5 |

## Math

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —
- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 0.8% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1108 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 6.4% |

## Knowledge

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —
- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 24.6% |

## Multilingual

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.3 (#150)
- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1340 | 1073 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1341 | 1132 |

## Instruction Following

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.4 (#172)
- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1315 | 1079 |

## Long Context

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.5 (#152)
- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1333 | 1092 |

## Writing & Preference

- Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 54.7 (#149)
- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282)

| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1364 | 1105 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1307 | 1067 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1355 | 1082 |

## FAQ

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than DeepSeek LLM 67B?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or DeepSeek LLM 67B better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and DeepSeek LLM 67B share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15.