Noometry

Model comparison

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 vs Trinity Large Thinking

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 and Trinity Large Thinking score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.2 vs 38.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 StepFun

39.2

Rank #171 Confirmed

Trinity Large Thinking Arcee AI

38.6

Rank #185 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Step 2 16k Exp 202412 scores higher in 2 categories and Trinity Large Thinking in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads 25.9 to 16.9.
  • Trinity Large Thinking has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Step 2 16k Exp 202412Trinity Large Thinking
ProviderStepFunArcee AI
Noometry Index39.238.6
Released—2026-04-01
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—80K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.25
Output $ / M tokens—$0.80
Results tracked1224

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 38.5 (#174), Trinity Large Thinking: 34.1 (#244)

BenchmarkStep 2 16k Exp 202412Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Coding13161381
LMArena WebDev—1238
SciCode—36.1%

Reasoning Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 25.9 (#142), Trinity Large Thinking: 16.9 (#298)

BenchmarkStep 2 16k Exp 202412Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Hard Prompts12991350
NYT Connections (extended)—16.5%
CritPt—0.9%
Thematic Generalization—41.6%
Surface Evolver Bench—15.6%

Math Trinity Large Thinking leads

Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 36.3 (#169), Trinity Large Thinking: 37.6 (#149)

BenchmarkStep 2 16k Exp 202412Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Math13041366

Knowledge Trinity Large Thinking leads

Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 35.2 (#187), Trinity Large Thinking: 40.9 (#113)

BenchmarkStep 2 16k Exp 202412Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Expert12791360
Vectara Hallucination Rate—6.9%

Multilingual Trinity Large Thinking leads

Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.7 (#181), Trinity Large Thinking: 46.2 (#160)

BenchmarkStep 2 16k Exp 202412Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Non-English12901325
LMArena Chinese13311373
LMArena Russian13241337
LMArena French—1374
LMArena German—1356
LMArena Japanese—1311
LMArena Korean—1306
LMArena Spanish—1357

Instruction Following Trinity Large Thinking leads

Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 67.9 (#192), Trinity Large Thinking: 70.5 (#162)

BenchmarkStep 2 16k Exp 202412Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Instruction Following12871334

Long Context Trinity Large Thinking leads

Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#170), Trinity Large Thinking: 41.3 (#144)

BenchmarkStep 2 16k Exp 202412Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Longer Query13071355

Writing & Preference Trinity Large Thinking leads

Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.3 (#173), Trinity Large Thinking: 53.8 (#158)

BenchmarkStep 2 16k Exp 202412Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Text13211340
LMArena Creative Writing13281320
LMArena Multi-Turn12921342

Frequently asked questions

Is Step 2 16k Exp 202412 better than Trinity Large Thinking?

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 and Trinity Large Thinking score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.2 vs 38.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Step 2 16k Exp 202412 or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Step 2 16k Exp 202412 and Trinity Large Thinking share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.

Related comparisons

Go deeper