Model comparison

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct vs Step 5 Preview

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.9 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct costs 1.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Step 5 Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Step 5 Preview StepFun

47.9

Rank #58 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Step 5 Preview in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Step 5 Preview leads 51.8 to 42.5.
  • Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is cheaper at $0.50 / $2 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $2.70 for Step 5 Preview.
  • Step 5 Preview accepts more context: 1.02M tokens versus 131K.
  • Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct and Step 5 Preview specifications
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B InstructStep 5 Preview
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)StepFun
Noometry Index43.047.9
Released2025-092026-09-16
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window131K1.02M
Max output33K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.50$1
Output $ / M tokens$2$2.70
Results tracked2518

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 5 Preview leads

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 42.5 (#98), Step 5 Preview: 51.8 (#36)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-Next 80B-A3B InstructStep 5 Preview
LMArena Coding14401480
LMArena WebDev—1564
SciCode—58.9%

Reasoning Step 5 Preview leads

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 31.1 (#81), Step 5 Preview: 40.0 (#57)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-Next 80B-A3B InstructStep 5 Preview
LMArena Hard Prompts14281465
Kagi LLM Benchmark66.7%—
CritPt—20.9%

Math Step 5 Preview leads

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 38.8 (#126), Step 5 Preview: 46.1 (#72)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-Next 80B-A3B InstructStep 5 Preview
LMArena Math14401470
ProofBench—42%
Omni-MATH46.7%—

Knowledge Too close to call

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 41.8 (#106), Step 5 Preview: 41.2 (#112)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-Next 80B-A3B InstructStep 5 Preview
LMArena Expert14171470
MMLU-Pro78.6%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.3%—
GPQA (HELM)63%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: —, Step 5 Preview: 41.0 (#41)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-Next 80B-A3B InstructStep 5 Preview
LMArena Vision—1267

Multilingual Step 5 Preview leads

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 52.1 (#93), Step 5 Preview: 53.8 (#54)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-Next 80B-A3B InstructStep 5 Preview
LMArena Non-English14071432
LMArena Chinese14601519
LMArena Russian14041436
LMArena Spanish14351439
LMArena French1413—
LMArena German1417—
LMArena Japanese1395—
LMArena Korean1364—

Instruction Following Step 5 Preview leads

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 70.8 (#159), Step 5 Preview: 76.0 (#50)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-Next 80B-A3B InstructStep 5 Preview
LMArena Instruction Following13891444
IFEval81%—

Long Context Step 5 Preview leads

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 37.0 (#223), Step 5 Preview: 44.5 (#64)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-Next 80B-A3B InstructStep 5 Preview
LMArena Longer Query14031455
Fiction.LiveBench55.6%—

Writing & Preference Step 5 Preview leads

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 58.0 (#121), Step 5 Preview: 62.8 (#71)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-Next 80B-A3B InstructStep 5 Preview
LMArena Text14171442
LMArena Creative Writing13341410
LMArena Multi-Turn14161447
WildBench80.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct better than Step 5 Preview?

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.9 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct costs 1.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Step 5 Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct or Step 5 Preview?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is cheaper. It lists at $0.50 per million input tokens and $2 per million output tokens; Step 5 Preview lists at $1 and $2.70.

Is Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct or Step 5 Preview better for coding?

Step 5 Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.8 versus 42.5 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Step 5 Preview does, with 1.02M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct and Step 5 Preview share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has 25 scored results on Noometry and Step 5 Preview has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper