Model comparison
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct vs Solar Pro4
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index. Solar Pro4 costs 1.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct scores higher in 6 categories and Solar Pro4 in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Solar Pro4 leads 42.0 to 37.0.
- Solar Pro4 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $2 for Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct.
- Solar Pro4 accepts more context: 524K tokens versus 131K.
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct | Solar Pro4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 41.5 |
| Released | 2025-09 | 2026-08-06 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 131K | 524K |
| Max output | 33K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.50 | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2 | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 25 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 41.9 (#101), Solar Pro4: 39.9 (#135)
| Benchmark | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1441 | 1439 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
Reasoning Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 30.1 (#79), Solar Pro4: 27.3 (#107)
| Benchmark | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1428 | 1398 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 66.7% | — |
Math Too close to call
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 36.3 (#118), Solar Pro4: 36.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1440 | 1418 |
| Omni-MATH | 46.7% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 41.3 (#102), Solar Pro4: 39.0 (#128)
| Benchmark | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1416 | 1421 |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 63% | — |
Multilingual Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 52.3 (#88), Solar Pro4: 49.0 (#134)
| Benchmark | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1407 | 1362 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1461 | 1417 |
| LMArena French | 1415 | 1403 |
| LMArena German | 1416 | 1351 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1398 | 1300 |
| LMArena Korean | 1366 | 1383 |
| LMArena Russian | 1403 | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1436 | 1408 |
Instruction Following Solar Pro4 leads
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 71.0 (#154), Solar Pro4: 72.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1388 | 1376 |
| IFEval | 81% | — |
Long Context Solar Pro4 leads
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 37.0 (#218), Solar Pro4: 42.0 (#125)
| Benchmark | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1403 | 1379 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 55.6% | — |
Writing & Preference Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 58.2 (#116), Solar Pro4: 56.7 (#133)
| Benchmark | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1417 | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1333 | 1313 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1415 | 1391 |
| WildBench | 80.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct better than Solar Pro4?
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index. Solar Pro4 costs 1.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct or Solar Pro4?
Solar Pro4 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct lists at $0.50 and $2.
Is Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct or Solar Pro4 better for coding?
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 39.9 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Solar Pro4 does, with 524K tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct and Solar Pro4 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has 25 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.