Model comparison

Qwen3 Max vs Step 3

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 40.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

43.7

Rank #87 Confirmed

Step 3 StepFun

40.5

Rank #149 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3 Max scores higher in 7 categories and Step 3 in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3 Max leads 48.1 to 36.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 72.5% for Qwen3 Max and 62.3% for Step 3.
  • Step 3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen3 Max and Step 3 specifications
Qwen3 MaxStep 3
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)StepFun
Noometry Index43.740.5
Released2025-09-23—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window262K—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.20—
Output $ / M tokens$6—
Results tracked3317

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3 Max leads

Qwen3 Max: 43.0 (#93), Step 3: 40.1 (#147)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3 MaxStep 3
LMArena Coding14561367
ALE-Bench370.45—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen3 Max: —, Step 3: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3 MaxStep 3
Vending-Bench 271.56—

Reasoning Step 3 leads

Qwen3 Max: 22.6 (#190), Step 3: 28.4 (#105)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3 MaxStep 3
Kagi LLM Benchmark72.5%62.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts14481355
NYT Connections (extended)30.1%—
Chess Puzzles4%—
Mystery Game Puzzles5%—
DTBench82.1%—
LMCA28.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index142.38—

Math Qwen3 Max leads

Qwen3 Max: 38.7 (#131), Step 3: 37.6 (#148)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3 MaxStep 3
LMArena Math14461366
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)18.9%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202573.3%—
MATH Level 597.1%—

Knowledge Qwen3 Max leads

Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#78), Step 3: 36.8 (#164)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3 MaxStep 3
LMArena Expert14551333
GPQA Diamond72.6%—
SimpleQA Verified48.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Qwen3 Max: —, Step 3: 35.5 (#86)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3 MaxStep 3
LMArena Vision—1177

Multilingual Qwen3 Max leads

Qwen3 Max: 53.7 (#62), Step 3: 46.3 (#159)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3 MaxStep 3
LMArena Non-English14291327
LMArena Chinese14781397
LMArena German14631371
LMArena Korean13991269
LMArena Russian14281331
LMArena Spanish14621371
LMArena French1449—
LMArena Japanese1397—

Instruction Following Qwen3 Max leads

Qwen3 Max: 74.8 (#87), Step 3: 70.4 (#164)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3 MaxStep 3
LMArena Instruction Following14191332

Long Context Qwen3 Max leads

Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#134), Step 3: 40.3 (#157)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3 MaxStep 3
LMArena Longer Query14381326
Fiction.LiveBench66.7%—
CL-bench14.5%—

Writing & Preference Qwen3 Max leads

Qwen3 Max: 62.4 (#76), Step 3: 54.3 (#151)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3 MaxStep 3
LMArena Text14391350
LMArena Creative Writing14021321
LMArena Multi-Turn14461341

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3 Max better than Step 3?

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 40.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Qwen3 Max or Step 3 better for coding?

Qwen3 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 40.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3 Max and Step 3 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3 Max has 33 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper