Model comparison

Qwen3 Coder Next vs Qwen3 Max

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 8.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3 Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3 Coder Next Alibaba (Qwen)

33.8

Rank #229 Reported

Qwen3 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

43.5

Rank #82 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen3 Max leads 42.4 to 35.8.
  • Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper at $0.12 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $1.20 / $6 for Qwen3 Max.
  • Qwen3 Coder Next has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen3 Coder Next and Qwen3 Max specifications
Qwen3 Coder NextQwen3 Max
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index33.843.5
Released2026-02-022025-09-23
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window262K262K
Max output66K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.12$1.20
Output $ / M tokens$0.80$6
Results tracked333

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3 Max leads

Qwen3 Coder Next: 35.8 (#206), Qwen3 Max: 42.4 (#93)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3 Coder NextQwen3 Max
SciCode32.3%—
WeirdML34.4%—
LMArena Coding—1456
ALE-Bench—370.45

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen3 Coder Next: —, Qwen3 Max: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3 Coder NextQwen3 Max
Vending-Bench 2—71.56

Reasoning Too close to call

Qwen3 Coder Next: 21.7 (#191), Qwen3 Max: 22.0 (#186)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3 Coder NextQwen3 Max
Kagi LLM Benchmark—72.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—30.1%
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles—4%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1448
Mystery Game Puzzles—5%
DTBench—82.1%
LMCA—28.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—142.41

Math Not comparable

Qwen3 Coder Next: —, Qwen3 Max: 37.6 (#94)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3 Coder NextQwen3 Max
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—18.9%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—73.3%
LMArena Math—1447
MATH Level 5—97.1%

Knowledge Not comparable

Qwen3 Coder Next: —, Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#72)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3 Coder NextQwen3 Max
GPQA Diamond—72.6%
SimpleQA Verified—48.7%
LMArena Expert—1457

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen3 Coder Next: —, Qwen3 Max: 53.9 (#58)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3 Coder NextQwen3 Max
LMArena Non-English—1429
LMArena Chinese—1479
LMArena French—1450
LMArena German—1463
LMArena Japanese—1399
LMArena Korean—1397
LMArena Russian—1428
LMArena Spanish—1463

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen3 Coder Next: —, Qwen3 Max: 75.0 (#81)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3 Coder NextQwen3 Max
LMArena Instruction Following—1420

Long Context Not comparable

Qwen3 Coder Next: —, Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#129)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3 Coder NextQwen3 Max
Fiction.LiveBench—66.7%
CL-bench—14.5%
LMArena Longer Query—1439

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen3 Coder Next: —, Qwen3 Max: 62.6 (#72)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3 Coder NextQwen3 Max
LMArena Text—1439
LMArena Creative Writing—1401
LMArena Multi-Turn—1446

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3 Coder Next better than Qwen3 Max?

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 8.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3 Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 Coder Next or Qwen3 Max?

Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper. It lists at $0.12 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Max lists at $1.20 and $6.

Is Qwen3 Coder Next or Qwen3 Max better for coding?

Qwen3 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3 Coder Next and Qwen3 Max share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3 Coder Next has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper